Hierarchical Classification from Relational Frame Theory: A Review

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ashby FG & Waldron EM (2000). The neuropsychological bases of category learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 10-14. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00049
• Astley SL, Peissig JJ, & Wasserman EA (2001). Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: Quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 252-268. Doi:10.1037/00977403.27.3.252.
• Barnes-Holmes D, MacCarthaigh S, & Murphy C (2014). Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and Attractiveness Bias: Directionality of Bias and Influence of Gender of Participants. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 333-351.
• Barnes-Holmes D, Staunton C, Barnes-Holmes Y, Whelan R, Stewart I, Commins S, Walsh D, Smeets P, & Dymond S (2004). Interfacing Relational Frame Theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, The Implicit Association Test, and event related potentials. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 215-240.
• Barnes-Holmes Y, Foody M, Barnes-Holmes D, & McHugh L (2013). Advances in research on deictic relations and perspective-taking. In S Dymond & B Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application (pp. 127–148) Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
• Barnes-Holmes Y, McHugh L, & Barnes-Holmes D (2004). Perspective-taking and Theory of Mind: A relational frame account. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 15-25. Doi: 10.1037/h0100133
• Barnes-Holmes Y (2001). Analysing relational frames: Studying language and cognition in young children. Unpublished doctoral thesis. National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland.
• Barsalou LW, Simmons WK, Barbey A, & Wilson CD (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91.
• Berens NM & Hayes SC (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental Evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45-71.
• Bush KM, Sidman M, & de Rose T (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
• Bruner JS, Goodnow JJ & Austin GA. (1956) A Study of Thinking Nex York: Wiley and Sons.
• DeRosse P & Fields L (2010). The contextually controled, feature-mediated classification of symbols. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 225-245
• Dixon MR & Zlomke KM (2005). Implementación del precursor del procedimiento de evaluación relacional en el establecimiento de marcos relacionales de igualdad, oposición y diferencia. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 37, 305-316.
• Dunne S, Foody M, Barnes-Holmes I, Barnes-Holmes D, Murphy C (2014). Facilitating repertoires of coordination, opposition distinction, and comparison in young children with autism. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100576
• Gil E, Luciano C, Ruiz FJ, & Valdivia Salas S (2012). A preliminary demonstration of transformation of functions through hierarchical relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12, 1-19.
• Gil E, Luciano C, Ruiz FJ, & Valdivia Salas (2014). Towards a functional analysis of hierarchical classification: A further experimental step. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 2, 137-153.
• Grieffee K & Dougher MJ (2002). Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 78, 433-447.
• Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, & Roche B (2001). Relational Frame Theory. A postskinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
• Hugenberg K Bodenhausen GV (2004). Ambiguity in Social Categorization: The Role of Prejudice and Facial Affect in Race Categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342-345.
• Kirsten E & Stewart I (2021). Assessing the Development of Relational Framing in Young Children. The Psychological Record. Doi:10.1007/s40732-021-00457-y.
• Lakoff G (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Luciano C, Gómez Becerra I, & Rodríguez Valverde M (2007). The Role of Multiple Exemplar Training and Naming in Establishing Derived Equivalence in an Infant. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349-365.
• Luciano C, Valdivia S, Berens N, Valverde M, Mañas I, & Ruiz F (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants. Coordination, difference, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In RA Rehfeldt & Y Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived Relational Responding. Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp.182- 210). Oakland: New Harbinger.
• Mandler JE (2000). Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 3-36.
• Markman EM & Seibert, J. (1976). Classes and collections: internal organization and resulting holistic properties. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 561-577.
• Medin DL & Rips LJ (2005). Concepts and Categories: Memory, Meaning, and Metaphysic. In KJ Holyoak & RG
• Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 37-72). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Ming S, Mulhern T, Stewart I, Moran L, & Bynum K (2018). Training class inclusion responding in typically developing children and individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 53-60. Doi: 10.1002/jaba.429.
• Mulhern, T., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2017). Investigating relational framing of categorization in young children. The Psychological Record, 67, 519-526. Doi:10. 1007/s40732-017-0255-y.
• Mulhern T, Stewart I, & McElwee J (2018). Facilitating relational framing of classification in young children. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 8, 55-68. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.04.001
• Murphy GL & Medin DL (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316. Doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
• O’Hora D, Barnes-Holmes D, Roche B, & Smeets PM (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437-460. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395484
• O’Hora D, Peláez M, & Barnes-Holmes D (2005). Derived relational responding and performance on verbal sub-tests of the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155-175. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395504
• O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rae, G., Robinson, K. & Chaudary, T. (2008). Temporal relations and intelligence: Correlating relational performance with performance on the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 58, 569-584. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395638
• O’Toole C., Barnes-Holmes D, Murphy C, O’Connor J, & Barnes-Holmes Y (2009). Relational flexibility and human intelligence: Extending the remit of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 9, 1-17.
• Palmer, D. C. (2002). Psychological essentialism: A review of E. Margolis and S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 597-607.
• Peraita H (1998). Conceptos y categorización. En MJ González Labra (Ed.), Introducción a la psicología del pensamiento (pp. 185-234). Madrid: Trotta.
• Piaget J (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. Roche B & Barnes D (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395177
• Rosch E (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.). Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, & Boyes-Braehm P (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8, 382-439.
• Rehfeldt RA & Barnes-Holmes Y (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. Rhodes M & Baron A (2019). The Development of Social Categorization. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1, 359-386. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084824
• Slattery B, Stewart I, & O’Hora D (2011). Testing for transitive class containment as a feature of hierarchical classification. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 243-260. Doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-243
• Slattery B & Stewart I (2014). Hierarchical classification as relational framing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 61-75. Doi: 10.1002/ jeab.63
• Stewart I, Slattery B, Chambers M, & Dymond S (2017). An empirical investigation of part-whole hierarchical relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 105-124. Doi: 10.1080/15021149.2017.1416525.
• Tajfel H (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
• Turner JC (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In JC
• Turner & EJ Lawler (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 2 (pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Vygotsky LS (1934). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Zagrabska P, Ming S, Mulhern T, & Stewart I (2020). Training class inclusion responding in individuals with autism: Further investigation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 2067-2080. Doi: 10.1002/jaba.712