Hierarchical Classification from Relational Frame Theory: A Review

  1. Lidia Budziszewska
  2. Jorge Villarroel Carrasco
  3. Enrique Gil
Aldizkaria:
International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

ISSN: 1577-7057

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Alea: 22

Zenbakia: 2

Orrialdeak: 143-162

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: International journal of psychology and psychological therapy

Laburpena

Hierarchical classification is of tremendous interest to both basic and applied research. This review explores hierarchical classification empirical studies from Relational Frame Theory (RFT). We identified 11 empirical articles that met inclusion criteria (demonstrated hierarchical responding in children or adults with an RFT theoretical approach). The objective of this qualitative systematic review is to offer both researchers and practitioners a solid and comprehensive view of types of protocols used from an RFT approach in establishing and analyzing hierarchical classification. Limitations and possible future research is discussed.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Ashby FG & Waldron EM (2000). The neuropsychological bases of category learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 10-14. Doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00049
  • Astley SL, Peissig JJ, & Wasserman EA (2001). Superordinate categorization via learned stimulus equivalence: Quantity of reinforcement, hedonic value, and the nature of the mediator. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 252-268. Doi:10.1037/00977403.27.3.252.
  • Barnes-Holmes D, MacCarthaigh S, & Murphy C (2014). Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure and Attractiveness Bias: Directionality of Bias and Influence of Gender of Participants. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 333-351.
  • Barnes-Holmes D, Staunton C, Barnes-Holmes Y, Whelan R, Stewart I, Commins S, Walsh D, Smeets P, & Dymond S (2004). Interfacing Relational Frame Theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, The Implicit Association Test, and event related potentials. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 215-240.
  • Barnes-Holmes Y, Foody M, Barnes-Holmes D, & McHugh L (2013). Advances in research on deictic relations and perspective-taking. In S Dymond & B Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: Research and application (pp. 127–148) Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
  • Barnes-Holmes Y, McHugh L, & Barnes-Holmes D (2004). Perspective-taking and Theory of Mind: A relational frame account. The Behavior Analyst Today, 5, 15-25. Doi: 10.1037/h0100133
  • Barnes-Holmes Y (2001). Analysing relational frames: Studying language and cognition in young children. Unpublished doctoral thesis. National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland.
  • Barsalou LW, Simmons WK, Barbey A, & Wilson CD (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91.
  • Berens NM & Hayes SC (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental Evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45-71.
  • Bush KM, Sidman M, & de Rose T (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
  • Bruner JS, Goodnow JJ & Austin GA. (1956) A Study of Thinking Nex York: Wiley and Sons.
  • DeRosse P & Fields L (2010). The contextually controled, feature-mediated classification of symbols. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 225-245
  • Dixon MR & Zlomke KM (2005). Implementación del precursor del procedimiento de evaluación relacional en el establecimiento de marcos relacionales de igualdad, oposición y diferencia. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 37, 305-316.
  • Dunne S, Foody M, Barnes-Holmes I, Barnes-Holmes D, Murphy C (2014). Facilitating repertoires of coordination, opposition distinction, and comparison in young children with autism. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100576
  • Gil E, Luciano C, Ruiz FJ, & Valdivia Salas S (2012). A preliminary demonstration of transformation of functions through hierarchical relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12, 1-19.
  • Gil E, Luciano C, Ruiz FJ, & Valdivia Salas (2014). Towards a functional analysis of hierarchical classification: A further experimental step. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 2, 137-153.
  • Grieffee K & Dougher MJ (2002). Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 78, 433-447.
  • Hayes SC, Barnes-Holmes D, & Roche B (2001). Relational Frame Theory. A postskinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  • Hugenberg K Bodenhausen GV (2004). Ambiguity in Social Categorization: The Role of Prejudice and Facial Affect in Race Categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342-345.
  • Kirsten E & Stewart I (2021). Assessing the Development of Relational Framing in Young Children. The Psychological Record. Doi:10.1007/s40732-021-00457-y.
  • Lakoff G (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Luciano C, Gómez Becerra I, & Rodríguez Valverde M (2007). The Role of Multiple Exemplar Training and Naming in Establishing Derived Equivalence in an Infant. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349-365.
  • Luciano C, Valdivia S, Berens N, Valverde M, Mañas I, & Ruiz F (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants. Coordination, difference, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In RA Rehfeldt & Y Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived Relational Responding. Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp.182- 210). Oakland: New Harbinger.
  • Mandler JE (2000). Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 3-36.
  • Markman EM & Seibert, J. (1976). Classes and collections: internal organization and resulting holistic properties. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 561-577.
  • Medin DL & Rips LJ (2005). Concepts and Categories: Memory, Meaning, and Metaphysic. In KJ Holyoak & RG
  • Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 37-72). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ming S, Mulhern T, Stewart I, Moran L, & Bynum K (2018). Training class inclusion responding in typically developing children and individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 53-60. Doi: 10.1002/jaba.429.
  • Mulhern, T., Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2017). Investigating relational framing of categorization in young children. The Psychological Record, 67, 519-526. Doi:10. 1007/s40732-017-0255-y.
  • Mulhern T, Stewart I, & McElwee J (2018). Facilitating relational framing of classification in young children. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 8, 55-68. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.04.001
  • Murphy GL & Medin DL (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316. Doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
  • O’Hora D, Barnes-Holmes D, Roche B, & Smeets PM (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437-460. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395484
  • O’Hora D, Peláez M, & Barnes-Holmes D (2005). Derived relational responding and performance on verbal sub-tests of the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155-175. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395504
  • O’Hora, D., Peláez, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rae, G., Robinson, K. & Chaudary, T. (2008). Temporal relations and intelligence: Correlating relational performance with performance on the WAIS-III. The Psychological Record, 58, 569-584. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395638
  • O’Toole C., Barnes-Holmes D, Murphy C, O’Connor J, & Barnes-Holmes Y (2009). Relational flexibility and human intelligence: Extending the remit of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 9, 1-17.
  • Palmer, D. C. (2002). Psychological essentialism: A review of E. Margolis and S. Laurence (Eds.), Concepts: Core readings. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 597-607.
  • Peraita H (1998). Conceptos y categorización. En MJ González Labra (Ed.), Introducción a la psicología del pensamiento (pp. 185-234). Madrid: Trotta.
  • Piaget J (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd. Roche B & Barnes D (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475. Doi: 10.1007/BF03395177
  • Rosch E (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.). Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, & Boyes-Braehm P (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8, 382-439.
  • Rehfeldt RA & Barnes-Holmes Y (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc. Rhodes M & Baron A (2019). The Development of Social Categorization. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1, 359-386. Doi: 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-084824
  • Slattery B, Stewart I, & O’Hora D (2011). Testing for transitive class containment as a feature of hierarchical classification. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 243-260. Doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-243
  • Slattery B & Stewart I (2014). Hierarchical classification as relational framing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 61-75. Doi: 10.1002/ jeab.63
  • Stewart I, Slattery B, Chambers M, & Dymond S (2017). An empirical investigation of part-whole hierarchical relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 105-124. Doi: 10.1080/15021149.2017.1416525.
  • Tajfel H (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
  • Turner JC (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In JC
  • Turner & EJ Lawler (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 2 (pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Vygotsky LS (1934). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Zagrabska P, Ming S, Mulhern T, & Stewart I (2020). Training class inclusion responding in individuals with autism: Further investigation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 2067-2080. Doi: 10.1002/jaba.712
Datuen iturria: Dialnet