Protocolo de entrenar actores para escenarios de alta fidelidad en educación médica

  1. Gleyvis Coro-Montanet 1
  2. Montserrat Diéguez-Pérez 1
  3. Fátima Cerdán-Gómez 1
  4. María Rosa García-Villalobos 1
  5. Margarita Gómez-Sánchez 1
  6. María Jesús Pardo-Monedero 1
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

Journal:
Revista latinoamericana de Simulación clínica

ISSN: 2683-2348

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 1

Issue: 3

Pages: 144-148

Type: Article

GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Revista latinoamericana de Simulación clínica

Abstract

Learning programmes based on clinical simulationprovide a safe environment for the learner and preventlearning errors from manifesting themselves in patientcare. The objective of this work is to share the protocolused in the briefing of actors for their training, faithfuland standardized characterization of their roles assimulated participants. The protocol responds to theapplication experience of three years (2016-2019) ofthe research teaching group in clinical simulation of theUniversidad Europea de Madrid. Having a functionalprotocol to train simulated participants that can be usedto train professional actors or not, increases the fidelityof the scenarios, facilitates the organization, managementand measurement of teaching processes, facilitates themanagement of material and human resources, reducescosts, allows optimizing times and favors the evaluationand better fulfillment of the student’s learning objectives.

Bibliographic References

  • 1. Lewis KL, Bohnert CA, Gammon WL, Hölzer H, Lyman L, Smith C, et al. The association of standardized patient educators (ASPE) standards of best practice (SOBP). Adv Simul. 2017; 2 (1): 10.
  • 2. Dudley F, Silverman J. The simulated patient handbook: a comprehensive guide for facilitators and simulated patients. 4ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC. 2018.
  • 3. Wallace P. Coaching standardized patients: for use in the assessment of clinical competence. Springer Publishing Company. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2006.
  • 4. Heine N, Ferguson D. Management of Standardized Patient Programs. In: Palaganas JC, Maxworthy JC, Epps CA, Mancini MEB, editors. Defining Excellence in Simulation Programs. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2015. pp. 391-422.
  • 5. Newlin-Canzone ET, Scerbo MW, Gliva-McConvey G, Wallace AM. The cognitive demands of standardized patients: Understanding limitations in attention and working memory with the decoding of nonverbal behavior during improvisations. Simul Healthc. 2013; 8 (4): 207-214. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31828b419e.
  • 6. Wallace P. Following the threads of an innovation: the history of standardized patients in medical education. Caduceus. 1997; 13 (2): 5-28.
  • 7. Williams B, Song JJY. Are simulated patients effective in facilitating development of clinical competence for healthcare students? A scoping review. Adv Simul. 2016; 1 (1): 6. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0006-1.
  • 8. Tun JK, Alinier G, Tang J, Kneebone RL. Redefining simulation fidelity for healthcare education. Simul Gaming. 2015; 46 (2): 159-174.
  • 9. Rethans JJ, Gorter S, Bokken L, Morrison L. Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: A systematic literature review. Med Educ. 2007; 41 (6): 537-549. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02689.x.
  • 10. Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27 (1): 10-28.
  • 11. Pascucci RC, Weinstock PH, O’Connor BE, Fancy KM, Meyer EC. Integrating actors into a simulation program: a primer. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9 (2): 120-126. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a3ded7.
  • 12. Cleland J, Abe K, Rethans JJ. The use of simulated patients in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 42. Med Teach. 2009; 31 (6): 477-486.
  • 13. Glassman PA, Luck J, O’Gara EM, Peabody JW. Using standardized patients to measure quality: evidence from the literature and a prospective study. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000; 26 (11): 644-653.
  • 14. Van der Vleuten CP, Swanson DB. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art. Teach Learn Medic: An Int J. 1990; 2 (2): 58-76.
  • 15. Madan AK, Caruso BA, Lopes JE, Gracely EJ. Comparison of simulated patient and didactic methods of teaching HIV risk assessment to medical residents. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15 (2): 114-119.
  • 16. Barrows HS. Training Standardized Patients to have physical findings. Chicago: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. 1999.
  • 17. Collins JP, Harden RM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 13: real patients, simulated patients and simulators in clinical examinations. Med Teach. 1998; 20 (6): 508-521.