The amazing human factors and their dissonances for autonomous CyberPhysical Systems

  1. Frederic, Vanderhaegen 1
  2. Victor, Jimenez 2
  1. 1 University of Valenciennes and Hainaut-Cambresis
    info

    University of Valenciennes and Hainaut-Cambresis

    Valenciennes, Francia

    ROR https://ror.org/02ezch769

  2. 2 Universidad Camilo José Cela
    info

    Universidad Camilo José Cela

    Villanueva de la Cañada, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03f6h9044

Actas:
2018 IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS)

Editorial: IEEE

ISBN: 978-1-5386-6531-2

Año de publicación: 2018

Tipo: Aportación congreso

DOI: 10.1109/ICPHYS.2018.8390773 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

The autonomy of a Cyber-Physical & Human Systems (CPHS) is studied regarding three main groups of prerequisites: the competences, the availabilities and the possibilities to act. Dissonances are discussed through two ways for each group. Firstly, they are presented as gaps or conflicts between autonomy prerequisites. Secondly, they are linked to human factors when they involve or impact them positively or negatively. The paper presents then an original framework to support the design of : future autonomous CPHS based on the study on human factors and on their dissonances.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01020
  • 10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.050
  • 10.1080/00140130500252990
  • 10.1007/s10111-017-0405-7
  • 10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006
  • 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.12.018
  • millot, (1998), Proceedings of the IEEE SMC CESA'98 Conference
  • 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.06.022
  • 10.1007/s10111-011-0196-1
  • dufour, (2014), Seminar on the Impact of Distracted Driving and Sleepiness on Road Safety
  • 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00068-2
  • 10.1080/10413200701601482
  • 10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00032-X
  • 10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.010
  • métayer, (2006), Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 56, pp. 179
  • spreitzer, (2007), The Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 54
  • kirk, (2012), Bangkok UNESCO Bangkok
  • 10.1016/B978-0-12-803634-1.00017-0
  • 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.008
  • 10.1080/01688639608408307
  • oken, (2006), Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, pp. 1885, 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017
  • dalton, (2007), Occupational Ergonomics, 7, pp. 143, 10.3233/OER-2007-7301
  • 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.071
  • yamane, (0), Shikakeology Designing Triggers for Behavior Change Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium
  • 10.15837/ijccc.2014.6.1484
  • black, (2002), Design for system success Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 20, pp. 1
  • 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.09.004
  • 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00198-8
  • 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.057
  • 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.07.007
  • 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.461
  • vanderhaegen, (1999), Le Travail Humain, 62, pp. 197
  • 10.1007/s10111-009-0134-7
  • donald, (2015), Task disengagement and implications for vigilance performance in CCTV surveillance Cognition technology & Work, 17, pp. 121
  • 10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00044-7
  • 10.1007/s10111-017-0402-x
  • 10.1109/TR.2017.2755543
  • 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.010
  • 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.375
  • 10.1007/s10111-010-0146-3
  • 10.1016/j.scispo.2014.11.002
  • 10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.028
  • 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4262-15.2016