Effectiveness of teaching methods used in higher education: a case study of European University of Madrid, Spain

  1. Leila Bardasuc 1
  2. Jose Luis Martinez Rubio 1
  3. Nicusor Marcel Udrea 2
  4. Monica Delia Domnica 2
  1. 1 European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  2. 2 Alma Mater University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania
Revista:
Problems of Education in the 21st Century

ISSN: 2538-7111,  1822-7864

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 67

Número: 1

Páginas: 17-28

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.33225/PEC/15.67.17 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Problems of Education in the 21st Century

Resumen

The purpose of this research was to determine the effectiveness of various teaching methods used in higher education and the perception of the students regarding these methods. In order to determine the possible ways to obtain strategic advantages and benefit from the strengths, the university has to know what drives foreign students in choosing a certain study program, even if it is outside their country of origin. At the same time, knowing the disadvantages that prevent them from doing so, helps the university include ways to correct the weaknesses or to offer solutions to them. The students, participating in this research, are enrolled at the European University in Madrid, from different study programs and degrees (license, master and doctoral programs) and were asked to answer a questionnaire about the use of teaching methods, about their perceptions upon effective teaching and the reasons that have determined them to choose to follow a study program. The results were in favor of a higher use of projects, group activities and case studies during classes and seminars at the European University of Madrid and of using new technologies in the educational system (e-learning, simulations, use of intranet, and activities in laboratories). As a primer characteristic searched for when choosing a study program, the students mentioned practice, mainly for developing abilities useful for applying for a job as soon as possible. It is, therefore, important to analyze the teaching methods and this research helps us understand how students see the teaching process and which are the methods that help them to better understand and to be more active during classes.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41 (3), 221-238.
  • Chapman, C. N., & McDonnell, F. E. (2015). R for Marketing Research and Analytics, USA: Springer International Publishing.
  • Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Cottrell, S., & Jones, E. (2003). Researching the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: An Analysis of Current Curriculum Practices. Innovative Higher Education, 27 (3), 169-181. Retrieved from http://www.cirtl.net/node/5443
  • Datculescu, P. (2012). Cercetarea practica de marketing [Practical marketing research]. Bucharest: Brandbuilders Group Publishing.
  • Feel, M., Shearmur, R., & Doloreaux, D. (2012). Knowledge-Intensive business services. London: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Parra Luna, F. (2004). Ante los problemas de la universidad española: 65 propuestas para conectarla con el futuro [Given the problems of the Spanish university: 65 proposals to connect with the future]. Madrid: Entrelineas Editores.
  • Gibbs, G. (1995). The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching. Quality in Higher Education, 1 (2), 147-158.
  • Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 8-35.
  • Kenneth, E. C., & Karen, E. J. (2013). Essentials of marketing research: Putting research into practice. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Conil, L. Y., & Hernández de Velazco, J. (2010). Epistemología y praxis de la innovación como factor determinante de la ventaja competitiva [Epistemology and practice of innovation as a determinant of competitive advantage]. Formación Gerencial, 1, 169-199. Retrieved from http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3297025
  • Mârza, B. (2013). Performanţă prin valoare. Crearea valorii-deziderat fundamental al performanţei organizaţiilor moderne [Performance throught Value. Creating Value – Fundamental Desiserate of the Modern’s Organization Performance]. Sibiu: „Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu Publishing.
  • Neagu, G. (2012). Şanse de acces la educaţie în societatea românească actuală [Chances to accede to education in the current Romanian society]. Iaşi: Lumen Publishing.
  • Petrina, S. (2007). Advanced teaching methods for the technology classroom, USA: Idea Group Inc. Publishing.
  • Theall, M., & Franklin, J. (2001). Looking for Bias in all the Wrong Places – A Search for Truth or a Witch Hunt in Student Ratings of Instruction? In The Student Ratings Debate: Are they Valid? How Can We Best Use Them?. In P. Theall, L. Abrami, & L. Mets (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Research, (pp. 45-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.