Neuroética en fotogramas

  1. Biscaia Fernández, José Miguel 1
  2. Mohedano del Pozo, Rosa Belén 1
  1. 1 Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Europea de Madrid
Journal:
Revista de medicina y cine

ISSN: 1885-5210

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 18

Issue: 3

Pages: 249-258

Type: Article

DOI: 10.14201/RMC.29542 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de medicina y cine

Abstract

The rise of neuroscience and neurotechnology seems unstoppable. Each time its therapeutic possibilities and the desire of neuroenhancement become more evident. In this essay we make a descriptive tour of a relatively new hybrid discipline, such as neuroethics, a discipline capable of serving as a deontological framework of the "neuro" professions, also capable of investigating aspects of the human condition traditionally reserved for other areas of knowledge. In addition, taking into account that this "neuro-essentialism" has also reached the film industry, we use science-fiction movies to explain the most important milestones in the neuroscience of ethics, such as the neurobiological origin of free will and moral responsibility.

Bibliographic References

  • Biscaia Fernández JM. Neuromejora: de la vanguardia científica y tecnológica a las dificultades y límites planteados por la filosofía de la mente y la bioética. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, 2021;16:1-17.
  • Cortina A. Neuroética y neuropolítica. Sugerencias para la educación moral. Madrid: Tecnos; 2011.
  • Evers K. Neuroética. Cuando la materia se despierta. Madrid: Katz Editores; 2011.
  • Roskies A. Neuroethics for the New Millenium. Neuron, 2002;35:21-23.
  • Bonete E. Neuroética práctica: una ética desde el cerebro. Bilbao: Desclée De Brouwer; 2010.
  • Levy N. Neuroética. Retos para el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Avarigani Editores; 2014.
  • Giordano J. Progreso neurotecnológico. Necesidad de una neuroética. En El próximo paso: la vida exponencial, 294-312. OpenMind BBVA; 2017.
  • Illes J. Neuroethics in a New Era of Neuroimaging. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003;24(9):1739-1741.
  • Searle JR. The Mystery of Consciousness. Londres: Granta Books; 1997.
  • Popper KR, Eccles JC. El yo y su cerebro. Madrid: Labor Universitaria. Monografías; 1985.
  • Giordano J, Benedikter R. Historicity and Implications of Science and Technology, Ombudsmanship, Responsability and Yeomanry: A Methodic Approach to Neuroethics. Ponencia presentada en la V Reunión Anual de la Sociedad Internacional de Neuroética, San Diego, California; 2013.
  • Biscaia JM, Mohedano R. Cerebros, mentes y robots: una aproximación a través del cine del siglo XXI. Rev. Med. Cine. 2021;17(1):49–56.
  • Libet B, Wright EW Jr, Gleason CA. Readiness-potentials preceding unrestricted 'spontaneous' vs. pre-planned voluntary acts. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1982;54:322-325.
  • Gazzaniga MS. The Ethical Brain. Nueva York: Dana Press; 2005.
  • Libet B, Freeman A, Sutherland K. The Volitional Brain. Towards a Neurosciencce of Free Will. Thorverton: Imprint Academic; 2000.
  • Ayer AJ. Libertad y necesidad. Ensayos filosóficos. Barcelona: Ariel; 1979.
  • Churchland PS. Brain-wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambribge. MA: MIT Press; 2002.
  • Morse SJ. New Neuroscience, Old Problems: Legal Implications of Brain Science. Cerebrum, 2004;6(4):81-90.
  • Goicoechea E. Antropología biosocial. Biología, cultura y sociedad. Madrid: Editorial Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces; 2013.
  • Dawkins R. El gen egoísta. Madrid: Editorial Bruño; 1990.
Data source: Dialnet