Docencia de la Medicina Intensiva. Aspectos bioéticos

  1. Samuel González López
  2. Vicente Gómez Tello
Aldizkaria:
Revista de bioética y derecho: publicación del Máster en bioética y derecho

ISSN: 1886-5887

Argitalpen urtea: 2020

Zenbakia: 48

Orrialdeak: 149-162

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1344/RBD2020.48.28926 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de bioética y derecho: publicación del Máster en bioética y derecho

Laburpena

All medical action always includes a double perspective: technical and moral. Bioethics emerges as a key tool to combine both aspects when medical decisions are taken in the daily work of a physician. In addition, teaching and learning are always clearly present in the working life of the majority of the practitioners. Currently, the advances of teaching Bioethics reached by the university community are remarkable. However, it was not so clear the level to the training during the medical residency and after the specialty. The context of Intensive Care Medicine dedicated to patients with critical diseases offers some characteristics which might be beneficial to the learning of a wide variety of bioethical aspects. These include, among others, the respect of the patient’s autonomy, the search of beneficence, also during end-of-life care, decision making in groups or in extreme emergency cases. Related to the way of teaching Bioethics, there are different approaches, from the master class to the flipped class or the case method whose greatest exponent is simulation. Our particular proposal consists in the integration of practice and discussion in groups as essential element in teaching Bioethics, helped by some recent methodologies like simulation.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Ramani S, Leinster S. AMEE Guide no. 34: Teaching in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2008;30(4):347-64.
  • Lázaro J, Gracia D. La relación médico-enfermo a través de la historia. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra. 2006;29:7-17.
  • Howe EG. New Paradigms in Medical Ethics. J Clin Ethics. 2016;27(4):267-80.
  • Bioética CMd. Declaración bioética de Gijón. Journal of the International Society of Bioethics. 2001(5):49-52.
  • Rensselaer Potter V. Bioethics, the Science of Survival1970. 127-53 p.
  • Herreros Ruiz Valdepeñas B, Bandrés Moya F. La bioética en España y Latinoamérica : ¿hay una bioética iberoamericana? [Madrid: Aula Internacional de Biomedicina, Ética y Derechos Humanos, Fundación Europea para el Estudio y Reflexión Ética; 2016.
  • Vergano M, Magavern E, Zamperetti N. Clinical ethics: what the anesthesiologist and the intensivist need to know. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(4):515-22.
  • ESCIM. CoBaTrICE: DOMAIN 12 : PROFESSIONALISM [Available from: http://www.cobatrice.org/Data/ModuleGestionDeContenu/PagesGenerees/en/02-competencies/0L-professionalism/18.asp.
  • Martin R, Reese AC, Browne EW, Baros-Johnson J. The Doctor's Dilemma [Available from: http://imc.meded.com/integrated/demos/dddemo/start/Default.htm.
  • Vergano M, Naretto G, Elia F, Gandolfo E, Calliera CN, Gristina GR. ELS (Ethical Life Support): a new teaching tool for medical ethics. Crit Care. 23. England2019. p. 204.
  • Foshee CM, Mehdi A, Bierer SB, Traboulsi EI, Isaacson JH, Spencer A, et al. A Professionalism Curricular Model to Promote Transformative Learning Among Residents. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):351-6.
  • Vertrees SM, Shuman AG, Fins JJ. Learning by doing: effectively incorporating ethics education into residency training. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(4):578-82.
  • Estella A, Martin MC, Hernandez A, Rubio O, Monzon JL, Cabre L. End of life critical patients: A multicenter study in Spanish Intensive Care Units. Med Intensiva. 2016;40(7):448-50.
  • Monzon Marin JL, Saralegui Reta I, Abizanda i Campos R, Cabre Pericas L, Iribarren Diarasarri S, Martin Delgado MC, et al. [Treatment recommendations at the end of the life of the critical patient]. Med Intensiva. 2008;32(3):121-33.
  • Casado M. Máster en Bioética y Derecho UB 2019 [Available from: http://www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu/es/master.
  • Mills S, Bryden DC. A practical approach to teaching medical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(1):50-4.
  • Guidelines for intensive care unit admission, discharge, and triage. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(3):633-8.
  • Carrasco G, Pallares A, Cabre L. [Cost of quality in Intensive Medicine. Guidelines for clinical management]. Med Intensiva. 2006;30(4):167-79.
  • Hurtubise L, Hall E, Sheridan L, Han H. The Flipped Classroom in Medical Education: Engaging Students to Build Competency2015. 35-43 p.
  • van de Grift TC, Kroeze R. Design T hinking as a Tool for Interdisciplinary Education in Health Care. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1234-8.
  • Bloom BS, Krathwohl DR, Masia BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives. the classification of educational goals : Cognitive domain Handbook 1 Handbook 1. New York: Longman; 1984.
  • Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63-7.
  • Tritrakarn P, Berg BW, Kasuya RT, Sakai DH. Medical school hotline: Can we use simulation to teach medical ethics? Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014;73(8):262-4.
  • Rudolph JW, Simon R, Rivard P, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25(2):361-76.
  • Hooper C. Ethics virtual patients: a new pedagogical tool for educators? J Med Ethics. 2015;41(7):549-52.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet