People power – Computer games in the classroom

  1. Iván Hilliard 1
  1. 1 Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain
Revista:
Higher learning research communications: HLRC

ISSN: 2157-6254

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 4

Número: 1

Páginas: 112-121

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.18870/HLRC.V4I1.200 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Higher learning research communications: HLRC

Resumen

This article presents a case study in the use of the computer simulation game People Power, developed by the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict. The principal objective of the activity was to offer students an opportunity to understand the dynamics of social conflicts, in a format not possible in a traditional classroom setting. Due to the game complexity, it was decided to play it in a day-long (8 hour) workshop format. A computer lab was prepared several weeks beforehand, which meant that each team of four students had access to a number of computers, being able to have the game open on several monitors at the same time, playing on one while using the others to constantly revise information as their strategy and tactics evolved. At the end of the workshop, and after handing in a group report, the 24 participants (6 groups) were asked to complete a short survey of the activity. The survey was divided into three areas: the game itself, skill development, and the workshop organization. Results showed a strong relationship between the activity and the course content, skills and competencies development, and practical know-how and leadership, as well as a strong feeling that it works well as a learning tool and is enjoyable.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • References Assimov, I. (1950). I, robot. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.
  • British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA). (2002). Curriculum software initiative: Computer Games in Education (CGE) Project. Available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk
  • Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2006). Overview of research on the educational use of video games. Digital Kompetanse, 1(3), 184-213.
  • Floeter, A. (2009). The Effectiveness of Game-based Learning. UW-Stout Journal of Student Research (8th ed), 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.uwstout.edu/rs/journal-of-student-research.cfm
  • Garcia, G. (2005). Digital game learning. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University, Department of Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.etc.edu.cn/eet/eet/
  • Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2003). Use of computer and video games in the classroom. In Proceedings of the Level Up Digital Games Research Conference. Netherlands: Universitet Utrecht.
  • Lee, J., Luchini, K., Michael, B., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (200l). More than just fun and games: Assessing the value of educational video games in the classroom. In E. Dykstra-Erickson & M. Tscheligi (Eds.), CHI'04 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1375-1378). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
  • Prensky, M. (2005). Computer games and learning: Digital game-based learning. In J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 97-122). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Rapeepisarn, K., Wong, K. W., Fung, C. C., & Khine, M. S. (2008). The relationship between game genres, learning techniques and learning styles in educational computer games. In Z. Pan, X. Zhang, A. El Rhalibi, W. Woo, & Y. Li (Eds.), Technologies for e-learning and digital entertainment : Proceedings of the Third International Conference: Edutainment 2008 (pp. 206-217). Berlin, Germany: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69736-7_53
  • Shade, D. D (1994). Computers and young children: Software types, social contexts, gender, age, and emotional responses. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 5(2), 177-209. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ489942)
  • Shiratuddin, N., & Landoni, M. (2002). Evaluation of content activities in children's educational software. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(2), 175-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(02)00011-3
  • Williams, D. L., Boone, R., & Kingsley, K. V. (2004). Teacher beliefs about educational software: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 213-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782413
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet