Innovación docente e identificación de inhibidores del aprendizaje en el área de empresaUna propuesta metodológica

  1. Baena Graciá, Verónica
Journal:
Espiral. Cuadernos del profesorado

ISSN: 1988-7701

Year of publication: 2010

Volume: 3

Issue: 6

Type: Article

DOI: 10.25115/ECP.V3I6.906 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Espiral. Cuadernos del profesorado

Abstract

The XXI century is characterized by an evolving environment that requires continuous adaptation. Both business competition and competitiveness are high and therefore, universities have to be sure their pupils not only acquire theoretical knowledge but also develop certain skills that guarantee long term success. This work identifies some factors that may constrain or inhibit the learning process in university students and describes a practice called �The Card Manufacturing Game�, which minimizes the effect of those inhibitors. Results help us to conclude that �The Card Manufacturing Game� may assist senior students of Business Bachelor Degree to improve the way they assimilate the theoretical concepts acquired in different business courses (marketing, operation and business management). Moreover, this learning practice helped the students to develop several valued skills in the professional environment, such as team working, knowledge management, planning, innovation, and responsibility, among others

Bibliographic References

  • Adrian, G. M. & Palmer, G. D. (1999). Toward a Model for Understanding and Improving Educational Quality in the Principles of Marketing Course. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(1), 25-33
  • Baena, V., Figueroa, C., Gabaldón, P., García-Viana, R., Gava, L., Hernán, R., López, C. & Priede, T. (2008). El espacio europeo de educación superior: Una oportunidad para la innovación educativa en el área empresarial. Madrid: Universidad Europea de Madrid.
  • Barber, M. (2008). A formula for great teaching. Times Educational Supplement, 48, 19-29.
  • Barreiros, B., Díez, E., Díez, J.T., Rondán, F.J. & Sánchez, M. J. (2004). La elección del canal de distribución comercial. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
  • Bullock, K. & Muschamp, Y. (2006). Learning about learning in the primary school. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 49-62.
  • Canzer, B. (1997). Marketing education on the internet: a world wide web based introductory marketing course design for the virtual-u project in distance education at Simon Fraser University. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 56-65.
  • Christensen, C. M., Horn, M.B. & Johnson, C.W. (2008). How 'disruptive innovation' will change the way we learn. Education Week, 27(39), 25-36
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha y the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(Sep), 297-334
  • Cuestas, P., Fenollar P. & Román, S. (2008). ¿Aprenden nuestros alumnos? Influencia de las variables y la infraestructura docente en el aprendizaje, Actas del XX. Actas del XX Encuentro de Profesores Universitario de Marketing, Gran Canarias (España).
  • De Juan, M. D., González, E., Parra, J. F., Kanther, A. & Sarabia, F. J. (2008) Antecedentes del aprendizaje autorregulado del estudiantes universitario de marketing. Actas del XX Encuentro de Profesores Universitario de Marketing, Gran Canarias (España).
  • Delors, J. (1998). La educación encierra un tesoro Colombia. UNESCO-Santillana.
  • Elliott, K. M. & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 24(2), 197-209
  • Eyler, G.N. & Cañizo, A.I. (2006). Actividad integradora de conocimientos, capacidades y habilidades en química orgánica, Actas de las VII Jornadas de Enseñanza Universitaria de la Química, Comodoro Ribadavia, Argentina.
  • García-Aracil, A. (2009). European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education. Higher Education, 57(1), 1-21
  • Gibbs, P. (2007). Editorial, Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 925-926.
  • Hair, J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante (5ª edición). Madrid: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
  • Hunt, L., Eagle, L., & Tchen, P (2004). Balancing marketing education y information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match? Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 75-88.
  • López, M. (2008). La integración de las Habilidades Sociales en la escuela como estrategia para la salud emocional, Revista Electrónica de Intervención Psicosocial y Psicología Comunitaria, 3(1), 16-19
  • Meterissian, S., Liberman, M. & Mcleod, P. (2007). Games as teaching tools in a surgical residency. Medical Teacher, 29(9/10), 258-270
  • Norman, M. & Hyland, T. (2003). The Role of Confidence in Lifelong Learning. Educational Studies, 29(2/3), 261-273.
  • Pagani, R. & González, J. (2002). El crédito europeo y el sistema educativo español. Informe técnico ECTS. Counsellors y Diploma Suplement Promoters.
  • Peterson, A. R. (1994). A meta-analysis of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 381-391
  • Pusztai, G. & Szabó, P. C. (2008). The Bologna process as a Trojan horse. European Education, 40(2), 85-103.
  • Shu-Hui, H.C. & Smith, R.A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426.
  • Whitehead, D.P. (2008). Thoughts on Education and Innovation. Childhood Education, 85(2), 106-118
  • Wright, L.K., Bitner, M.J. & Zeithaml, V.A. (1994). Paradigm shifts in business education: using active learning to deliver services marketing content. Journal of Marketing Education, 16(Fall), 5-19.
Data source: Dialnet