Andragogía digitalnecesidad de saber y papel de la experiencia en un Máster universitario en línea

  1. Iluminada Sánchez-Doménech 1
  2. Miguel Ángel Cabeza-Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 UniversidadInternacional de La Rioja, UNIR (España)
Revista:
RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1138-2783

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 27

Número: 2

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5944/RIED.27.2.38799 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: RIED: revista iberoamericana de educación a distancia

Resumen

La alta demanda actual de formación en línea, las elevadas tasas de abandono y la heterogeneidad del alumnado que cursa másteres en esta modalidad, reclama poner atención en los distintos perfiles y sus diferentes formas de aprender. La andragogía provee un marco teórico para comprender el aprendizaje de las personas adultas, aunque es necesario revisitar sus principios desde la formación en línea y a través de la lente de los propios estudiantes actuales. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer la autoidentificación de los estudiantes con los principios del aprendizaje adulto de la andragogía de Knowles. En concreto, se centra en dos de los principios de esta teoría: la necesidad de saber (NS) y el papel de la experiencia (PE). Se empleó un método mixto: un análisis cuantitativo descriptivo e inferencial de un cuestionario se complementa con un análisis cualitativo de entrevistas. Se diseñó y validó un cuestionario que cumplimentaron 245 estudiantes, y se analizó la correcta fiabilidad del instrumento. Adicionalmente, se llevaron a cabo 5 entrevistas al alumnado sobre ítems del cuestionario. Los resultados muestran diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el PE en función de la experiencia laboral previa en educación, pero no se encuentran diferencias en las preferencias por las estrategias de aprendizaje analizadas relacionadas con los principios NS y PE de la andragogía en función del género ni la edad ni situación laboral. Como conclusión, se defiende la vigencia y validez, de los principios andragógicos NS y PE para el alumnado en línea del siglo XXI.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akintolu, M., & Letseka, M. (2021) The andragogical value of content knowledge method: the case of an adult education programme in Kwa-Zulu Natal Province of South Africa. Heliyon, 7(9), 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07929
  • Aljohani, O. H., & Alajlan, S. M. (2021). The Application of Andragogy for the Advanced Diploma Program in Education at Saudi Arabia's Taif University. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20210701.oa1
  • Arghode, V., Brieger, E. W., & McLean, G. N. (2017). Adult learning theories: implications for online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(7), 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2017-0014
  • Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 152-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.002
  • Baldwin, S. J., Ching, Y.-H., & Friesen, N. (2018). Online course design and development among college and university instructors: An analysis using grounded theory. Online Learning, 22(2), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2017-0014
  • Blackley, S., & Sheffield, R. (2015). Digital andragogy: A richer blend of initial teacher education in the 21st century. Issues in Educational Research, 25, 397-414. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.209852
  • Bonett, D. G. (2002). Sample Size Requirements for Testing and Estimating Coefficient Alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(4), 335-340. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027004335
  • Carreira, P., & Lopes, A. S. (2019). Drivers of academic pathways in higher education: traditional vs. non-traditional students. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1675621
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. (3ª ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
  • De Abreu, N. M. (2020). Managing Instructional Strategies in Classrooms with adult learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 68(2), 71-83 https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2020.1712578
  • Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.020
  • Donavant, B. W. (2009). The New, Modern Practice of Adult Education. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609331546
  • Ferreira, D., & Mclean, G. (2017). Applying the Assumptions of Adult Learning Online, Language Research Bulletin, 32, ICU, Tokyo.
  • García Aretio, L. (2019). El problema del abandono en estudios a distancia. Respuestas desde el Diálogo Didáctico Mediado. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 245-270. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22433
  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 238. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.238
  • Henrikson, R., & Baliram, N. (2023). Examining voice and choice in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00401-w
  • Johnson, B. A. (2014). Transformation of online teaching practices through implementation of appreciative inquiry. Online Learning, 18(3). 1-21 https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.428
  • Kamışlı, H., & Özonur, M. (2017). The Effects of Training – Based on Knowles’ Adult Education Principles – On Participants. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(12), 8405-8414. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80801
  • Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Online learning across ethnicity and age: A study on learning interaction participation, perception, and learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 61, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.003
  • Kennan, S., Bigatel, P., & Hoewe, J. (2018). The (Lack of) Influence of Age and Class Standing on Preferred Teaching Behaviors for Online Students. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 163-181 https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1086
  • Kleinke, S., & Lin, Y. (2020). Application of Adult Learning Theory to STEM Education in Online Learning Environment. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274197
  • Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge Adult Education.
  • Knowles, M. S. (1990). Adult Learner. A neglected species. 4ª ed. Gulf Publishing Company.
  • Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., Swanson, R. A., Swanson, R., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612
  • Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
  • Lanford, M. (2020). In Pursuit of Respect: The Adult Learner Attending Community College in the “New Economy”. The Educational Forum, 85(1), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1775329
  • Lee, K. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001
  • Liu, D., & Morgan, W. J. (2018). Why do students enroll for postgraduate education in China? The influence of gender and of family habitus. Gender and Education, 32(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1447092
  • Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on on-line teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
  • McCauley, K. D., Hammer, E. e Hinojosa, A. S. (2017). An Andragogical Approach to Teaching Leadership. Management Teaching Review, 2(4), 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298117736885
  • Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3
  • Ministerio de Universidades. (2023). Datos y Cifras del Sistema Universitario Español. Publicación 2022-2023. https://www.universidades.gob.es/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/DyC_2023_web_v2.pdf
  • Moll, I. (2023). A critique of andragogy in the South African TVET context. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 6(1), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.14426/jovacet.v6i1.318
  • Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  • Pontes, A., Ariza, L., & Del Rey, R. (2010). Identidad profesional docente en aspirantes a profesorado de enseñanza secundaria. Psychology, Society, & Education, 2(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v2i2.440
  • Purwati, D., Mardhiah, A., Nurhasanah, E., & Ramli, R. (2022). The Six Characteristics of Andragogy and Future Research Directions in EFL: A Literature Review. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1), 86-95. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i1.7473
  • Rodrigo, C., Iniesto, F., & García-Serrano, A. (2024). Applying andragogy for integrating a MOOC into a formal online learning experience in computer engineering. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23493
  • Roessger K. M., Roumell, E. A., & Weese J. (2020). Rethinking andragogical assumptions in the global age: How preferences for andragogical learning vary across people and cultures. Studies in Continuing Education, 44(1), 14-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1732335
  • Sato, T., Haegele, J. A., & Foot, R. (2017): Developing Online Graduate Coursework in Adapted Physical Education Utilizing Andragogy Theory. Quest, 69(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2017.1284679
  • Schultz, R. B. (2012). A Critical Examination of the Teaching Methodologies Pertaining to Distance Learning in Geographic Education: Andragogy in an Adult Online Certificate Program. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 2(1), 45-60. ISSN: 2146-0353.
  • Smidt, E., Li, R., Bunk, J., Kochem, T., & McAndrew, A. (2017). The meaning of quality in an online course to administrators, faculty, and students. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 28(1), 65-86. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/174185/
  • St. Clair, R., & Käpplinger, B. (2021). Alley or Autobahn? Assessing 50 Years of the Andragogical Project. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(3), 272-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136211027879
  • Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
  • Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157-190. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
  • Tainsh, R. (2016). Thoughtfully Designed Online Courses as Effective Adult Learning Tools. Journal of Adult Education, 45(1), 7-9.
  • Trammell, B. A., & LaForge, C. (2017). Common challenges for instructors in large online courses: Strategies to mitigate student and instructor frustration. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1). https://www.thejeo.com/archive/archive/2017_141/jeo_common_challenges_for_instructors_inpdf/
  • Valli, R., Valli, P., & Lähdesmäki, S. (2017). Meaningful learning experiences in the Finnish teacher education. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 5(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v5i2.4471
  • Van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327-1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263
  • Velardi, S., Leahy, J., Collum, K., McGuire, J., & Ladenheim, M. (2020). Adult learning theory principles in knowledge exchange networks among maple syrup producers and beekeepers in Maine. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1773283
  • Vuori, J. (2019). Engaged or entitled? Study orientations among traditional and non-traditional business students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1646237
  • Watts, K. A. (2018). Tools and Principles for Effective Online Library Instruction: Andragogy and Undergraduates. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 12(1-2), 49-45 https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2018.1428712
  • Youde, A. (2018). Andragogy in blended learning contexts: effective tutoring of adult learners studying part-time, vocationally relevant degrees at a distance. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(2), 1-18 https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1450303
  • Yurdugül, H. (2008). Minimum sample size for Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: a Monte-Carlo study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 35(35), 1-9. http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/571-published.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet