Influencia del compromiso y aceptación del rol y la cohesión de grupo en deportes de equipo con categoría en formación

  1. López Gajardo, Miguel A. 1
  2. Ponce Bordón, José Carlos 2
  3. Lobo, David 2
  4. Nobai, Hadi 2
  5. Llanos Muñoz, Rubén 1
  1. 1 Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura
  2. 2 Facultad de Formación del Profesorado, Universidad de Extremadura
Journal:
EmásF: revista digital de educación física

ISSN: 1989-8304

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 83

Pages: 28-43

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: EmásF: revista digital de educación física

Abstract

The influence of psychological aspects, such as roles and group cohesiveness, is great in team sports, especially with respect to performance, social relations and effectiveness of the task. This research work pretends to find a relation between these psychological factors in team sport players from the under-14 and under-16 categories of different sports. Throughout the process, 846 samples were collected in two different periods, and 259 of them were used in this research. The main objective was to analyze the differences between both categories when it comes to acceptance of roles and group cohesiveness and to stablish a relation between them. To achieve that, descriptive analysis and non-parametric analysis were carried out. Results showed that age can have an influence on the acceptance of roles and that the initial perception of their teammates can vary, leading to a lower

Bibliographic References

  • Bales, R., Slater, P. Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. En R. Bales, y T. Parsons, Family socialization and interaction process. Free Press; 1955. p259-306.
  • Bandura, A. Self-Efficacy. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology; 2010.
  • Beauchamp, M., Eys, M. Dinámicas de grupo en el ejercicio y en la psicología del deporte. Paidotribo; 2017.
  • Benson, A., Eys, M., Surya, M., Dawson, K., Schneider, M. Athletes’ perceptions of role acceptance in interdependent sport teams. The sport psychologist, 2013;27(3):263-280.
  • Benson, A., Surya, M., Eys, M. Conceptual advances in role perceptions in sport. Nova Science; 2013.
  • Biddle, B., Thomas, E. Role Theory: Concepts and Research. Oxford: Butterworth-Henemann: 1966.
  • Bruner, M., Eys, M., Wilson, K., Côté, J. Group cohesion and positive youth development in team sport athletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2014;3(4):219-227.
  • Buton, F., Fontayne, P., Heuzé, J.P., Bosselut, G., Raimbault, N. The QAG-a. Small Group Research, 2007;38(2):235-264.
  • Carron, A., Colman, M., Wheeler, J., Stevens, D. Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2002;24(2):168-188.
  • Carron, A., Widmeyer, W., Brawley, L. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1985;7(3):244-266.
  • Carron, A, Eys. M. Group dynamics in sport. Morgantown: WV: Firness Information Technology; 2012.
  • Cope, C., Eys, M., Beauchamp, M., Robert, S., Bosselut, G. Informal roles on sport teams. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2011;9(1):19-30.
  • Eys, M., Beauchamp, M., Godfrey, M., Dawson, K., Loughead, T., Schinke, R. Role Commitment and Acceptance in a Sport Context. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2020;42(2):89-101.
  • Eys, M., Carron, A. Role ambiguity, task cohesion, and task self-efficacy. Small Group Research, 2011;32(3):356-373.
  • Eys, M., Loughead, T., Bray, S., Carron, A. Development of a cohesion questionnaire for youth: The youth sport environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2009;31(3):390-408.
  • Field, A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. California: SAGE publications Ltd; 2009.
  • Gardner, D., Shields, D., Bredemeier, B., Bostrom, A. The relationship between perceived coaching behaviors and team cohesion among baseball and softball players. The Sport Psychologist, 1996;10(4):367-381.
  • Heuzé, J.P., Fontayne, P. Questionnaire sur l’ambiance du groupe: A frenchlanguage instrument for measuring group cohesion. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2002;24(1):42-67.
  • Holt, N., Sparkes, A. (2001). An ethnographic study of cohesiveness in a college soccer team over a season. The sport Psychologist, 2001;15(3):237-259
  • Kim, J., Coleman, T., Godfrey, M., Vierimaa, M., Eys, M. The dynamics of informal role development within sport teams: A case study approach. Psychology Of Sport And Exercise, 2020;48:101670.
  • López Gajardo, M.A., González Ponce, I., Vaquero, M., Tapia Serrano, M. A., Leo, F.M. Validación en Castellano de la Role Commitment In Sport Survey. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 2021;38(2):95-110.
  • Lott, A., Lott, B. Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 1965;64(4):259-309.
  • Mabry, E., Barnes, R. The dynamics of small group communication. Englewood cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
  • Montero, I., León, O. A guide for naming research studies in psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 2007;7(3):847-862.
  • Pardo Merino, A., Ruiz Díaz, M. SPSS 11. Guía para el análisis de datos.Madrid: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
  • Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., Parker, J. Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Handbook of Child Psychology; 2007.
Data source: Dialnet