Treinta años del debate parlamentarismo-presidencialismoun balance de las evidencias

  1. Linares, Sebastián
Zeitschrift:
Revista española de ciencia política

ISSN: 1575-6548

Datum der Publikation: 2011

Nummer: 27

Seiten: 9-44

Art: Artikel

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Revista española de ciencia política

Zusammenfassung

Se hace una evaluación del desempeño del presidencialismo en perspectiva comparada con el parlamentarismo en tres dimensiones: 1) en la generación de conflictos o situaciones de bloqueo entre ramas de gobierno, 2) en la quiebra de la democracia y 3) en las interrupciones prematuras de mandato. En cada una de las tres dimensiones resumo los argumentos teóricos a favor y en contra y evalúo la validez de las evidencias empíricas existentes. El artículo sostiene que tenemos buenos argumentos y evidencias para pensar que, a igualdad de condiciones, el presidencialismo exhibe un desempeño inferior al parlamentarismo en todos los componentes evaluativos. Luego, argumento que la explicación de estas diferencias podemos encontrarlas en el �efecto� que la variable �forma de gobierno� introduce en el sistema político.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Alcántara, M. y García Montero, M. 2008. “Institutions and Politicians: An Analysys of the Factors that determine Presidential Legislative Success“, Working Paper 348: Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame.
  • Altman, D. 2000. “The Politics of Coalition Formation and Survival in n Multiparty Presidential Democracies: The Case of Uruguay”, 1989-1999. Party Politics 6: 259.
  • Álvarez, M. y Marsteintredet, L. 2010. “Presidential and Democratic Breakdowns in Latin America: Similar Causes, Different Outcomes“, en Llanos y Marsteintredet (ed.). 2010. Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America. Palgrave MacMillan, 2010: 33-50.
  • Amorim Neto, O. 1994. “Formaçâo de gabinetes presidenciais no Brasil: coalizão versus cooptaçâo”, Nova Economia. Rio de Janeiro nº 1.
  • Amorim Neto, O. 2002. “Presidential Policy-Making Strategies and Cabinet Formation in Latin America´s Presidential Democracies, 1946-1995”. Artículo presentado para la conferencia “El Gobierno Dividido en México: Riesgos y Oportunidades”, May 6-7. 2002, CIDE, Ciudad de México.
  • Amorim Neto, O. 2005. “Cabinet Durability in Presidential Democracies”. Paper prepared for presentation at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September 1-4.
  • Amorim Neto, O. 2006. “The Presidential Calculus: Executive Policy Making and Cabinet Formation in the Americas“, Comparative Political Studies 39, 4: 415-440.
  • Brown Araúz, H. 2004. “Los partidos políticos en Centroamérica. Un estudio institucional comparado sobre la disciplina partidista en Costa Rica, Guatemala y Panamá”. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
  • Carey, J. 2005. “Presidential versus Parliamentary Government”. C. M´enard and M. M. Shirley (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Springer: 91-122.
  • Chasquetti, D. 2008. Democracia, presidencialismo y partidos políticos en América Latina: Evaluando la difícil combinación. Instituto de Ciencias Políticas. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas de la República.
  • Cheibub, J. A. 1998. “Elections and Alternation in Power in Democratic Regimes”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
  • Cheibub, J. A. 2002a. “Presidentialism and Democratic Performance“, en The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management and Democracy, ed.Andrew Reynolds. New York: Oxford University Press, 104-140.
  • Cheibub, J. A. 2002b. “Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations and the Survival of Presidential Democracies”, en Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, nº 3: 284-312.
  • Cheibub, J. A. y Limongi, F. 2002. “Modes of Government Formation and the Survival of Presidential Regimes: Presidentialism and Parliamentarism Reconsidered”, Annual Review of Political Science 5: 151-179.
  • Cheibub, J. A. y Limongi, F. 2004. Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism, . British Journal of Political Science.
  • Cheibub, J. A.; Przeworski, A., y Saiegh, S. 2004. Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 34: 565-587.
  • Cleto Suárez, W. 1982. “El Poder Ejecutivo en América Latina: su capacidad operativa bajo regímenes presidenciales”, Revista de Estudios Políticos 29: 109-144.
  • Deheza, G. I. 1998. “Gobiernos de coalición en el sistema presidencial: América del Sur”, en Dieter Nohlen y Mario Fernández (eds.). El presidencialismo renovado: Institucionalismo y cambio político en América Latina. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad 35: 151-169.
  • Elgie, R. 2005. “A Fresh Look at Semi-Presidentialism: Variation on a Theme”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 16, nº 3, July 2005: 98-112.
  • Elgie, R. 2005. 2008. “The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism. Are They Exaggerated?”, Democratization 15 (1): 49-66.
  • Elgie, R. y Schleiter, P. 2009. Variation in the Durability of Semi-Presidential Democracies. Artículo presentado en el Congreso Mundial de IPSA (International Political Science Association), celebrado en Santiago de Chile, 2009.
  • Hochstetler, K. 2006. “Rethinking Presidentialism: Challenges and Presidential Falls in South America”, Comparative Politics 38 (4): 401-418.
  • Hochstetler, K. y Edwards, M. E. 2007. “Interrupted Presidencies: Identifying and Explaining a South American Anomaly”. Paper prepared for the meeting of the European Consortium of Political Research, Pisa, Italy, 6-8 September.
  • Jones, M. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Kellam, M. 2004. “When Politics is Local: Coalitional Instability in Latin America”. Paper delivered at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
  • Laver, M. y Schofield, N. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laver, M. 2003. “Government Termination”. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2003: 6: 23-40.
  • Lijphart, A. 1992. Presidential versus Parliamentary Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Linz, J. J. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration, Baltimore, Md., The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Linz, J. J. 1990. “The Perils of Presidentialism”, Journal of Democracy 1 (1): 51-69.
  • Linz, J. J. 1994. Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference, en Linz, J. y Valenzuela, A. The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Linz, J. J. y Stepan, A. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Linz, J. J. y Valenzuela, A. (eds.) 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Llanos, M. y Marsteintredet, L. 2010. Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America Causes and Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies. Palgrave MacMillan, 2010.
  • Llanos, M. y Marsteintredet, L. 2010. “Introduction: Presidentialism and Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America”, en Llanos y Marsteintredet. 2010. Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America. Palgrave MacMillan, 2010, 2-13.
  • Mainwaring, S. y Shugart, M. (eds.) 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Morgenstern, S. y Nacif, B. (eds.) 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America, Cambridge University Press, Nueva York.
  • Müller y K. Strom 2000. Coalition governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Müller, W., Bergman, T. y Strom, K. 2003. “Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problems”, en Strøm, Müller, and Bergman (eds.). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, 3-32.
  • Mustapic, A. M. 2005. “Inestabilidad sin colapso. La renuncia de los presidentes: Argentina en el año 2001”, Desarrollo Económico 2005, 45 (178): 263-280.
  • Mustapic, A. M. 2005b. ¿El fin del mandato fijo? El caso de la presidencia de De la Rúa, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, mimeo.
  • Mustapic, A. M. 2006. “América Latina: las renuncias presidenciales y el papel del Congreso”, en Parliamentary practices in presidential systems: Perspectives on parliamentary power in Latin America, European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Chipre, 25-30 de abril.
  • Mustapic, A. M. 2010. “Presidentialism and Early Exits: The Role of the Congress”, en Llanos, M. y Marsteintredet, L. 2010. Presidential Breakdowns in Latin America Causesand Outcomes of Executive Instability in Developing Democracies. Palgrave Mac-Millan, 2010, 17-33.
  • Negretto, G. 2005. “The Study of Presidentialism in Latin America: A Critical Assessment”. Paper presented at American Political Science Association, Washington DC, August 31, September 4, 2005.
  • Negretto, G. 2006. “Minority Presidents and Democratic Performance. Latin American”, Politics and Society, vol. 48, nº. 3, Fall 2006, 63-92.
  • Ollier, M. M. 2008. “La institucionalización democrática en el callejón: La inestabilidad presidencial en Argentina (1999-2003)”, Revista América Latina Hoy 49, 2008, 73-103.
  • Ollier, M. M. y Pérez Liñán, A. 2003. “¿Lo similar en lo distintivo? Crisis políticas en Brasil y en la Argentina”. Textos 2003, 4: 54-67.
  • Pérez-Liñán, A. 2003. “Pugna de poderes y crisis de gobernabilidad. ¿Hacia un Nuevo presidencialismo?”, en Latin American Research Review, vol. 38, nº 3, 149-164 October.
  • Pérez-Liñán, A. 2007. Crises Without Breakdown: Presidential Impeachment and The New Political Instability In Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
  • Riggs, F. W. 1992. “Presidentialism: A Problematic Regime Type”, en Lijphart, A. Presidential vs. Parliamentary Government (ed.), Oxford, 1992, 219.
  • Robinson, J. A y Torvik, R. 2008. Endogenous Presidentialism. Unpublished paper, HarvardUniversity: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~jrobins/researchpapers/unpublishedpapers/jr_presidentialism7.pdf
  • Ryals, C. y Golder, S. 2010. “Measuring government duration and stability in Central Eastern European democracies”. European Journal of Political Research 49: 119-150.
  • Saalfeld, T. 2008. “Institutions, Chances and Choices: The Dynamics of Cabinet Survival”, en Strom, K., Müller, W. y Bergman, T. Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford University Press: 327-367.
  • Saiegh, S. 2009. Political Prowess or “Lady Luck”? Evaluating Chief Executives’ Legislative Success Rates. The Journal of Politics, vol. 71, nº4, october 2009: 1342-1356.
  • Samuels, D. y Shugart, M. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers. Cambridge University Press.
  • Schleiter, P. 2009. “Non-partisan ministers in cabinets: who gets in and what do they stand for? An approach and an application to Russia”. Artículo presentado en el Congreso IPSA 2010, en Santiago de Chile.
  • Schleiter, P. y Morgan-Jones, E. 2009. “Constitutional Powers and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets”, American Political Science Review, vol. 103, nº 3, agosto 2009: 496-512. Shugart, M. 2005. Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns. Working Paper: http://dss.ucsd.edu/~mshugart/workingpapers.html
  • Shugart, M. y Carey, J. M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Shugart, M. y Mainwaring, S. 1997. “Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin merica: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate”, en Scott Mainwaring y Matthew Soberg Shugart(eds.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 12-54.
  • Sridharan, E. 2008. “Coalition Politics in India: Types, Duration, Theory and Comparison”. Institute of South Asian Studies, Working Paper, 23 September 2008.
  • Stepan, A. y Skach, C. 1994. “Presidentialism and Parliamentarism in Comparative Perspective”, en The Failure of Presidential Democracy, vol. 1, 1994, Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo (eds.), The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Strom, K. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet