Detecting deception, partisan, and social biases

Abstract

Today, the political world has as much or more impact on society than society has on the political world. Political leaders, or representatives of political parties, use their power in the media to modify ideological positions and reach the people in order to gain popularity in government elections. Through deceptive language, political texts may contain partisan and social biases that undermine the perception of reality. As a result, harmful political polarization increases because the followers of an ideology, or members of a social category, see other groups as a threat or competition, ending in verbal and physical aggression with unfortunate outcomes. The Natural Language Processing (NLP) community has new contri-butions every day with approaches that help detect hate speech, insults, of f ensive messages, and false information, among other computational tasks related to social sciences. However, many obstacles prevent eradicating these problems, such as the dif f i culty of having annotated texts, the limitations of non-interdisciplinary approaches, and the challenge added by the necessity of interpretable solutions. This thesis focuses on the detection of partisan and social biases, tak-ing hyperpartisanship and stereotypes about immigrants as case studies. We propose a model based on a masking technique that can detect deceptive language in controversial and non-controversial topics, capturing patterns related to style and content. Moreover, we address the problem by evalu-ating BERT-based models, known to be ef f ective at capturing semantic and syntactic patterns in the same representation. We compare these two ap-proaches (the masking technique and the BERT-based models) in terms of their performance and the explainability of their decisions in the detection of hyperpartisanship in political news and immigrant stereotypes. In order to identify immigrant stereotypes, we propose a new taxonomy supported by social psychology theory and annotate a dataset from partisan interventions in the Spanish parliament. Results show that our models can help study hyperpartisanship and identify dif f erent frames in which citizens and politi-cians perceive immigrants as victims, economic resources, or threat. Finally, this interdisciplinary research proves that immigrant stereotypes are used as a rhetorical strategy in political contexts.