Situation of Physiotherapy Clinics in the Community of Madrid in Relation to the Concept of Sustainability: A Survey Study

  1. Sánchez Ibáñez, Alejandro 1
  2. Franco Hidalgo-Chacón, María de las Mercedes 1
  3. Sánchez-Romero, Eleuterio A. 2233
  4. Cuenca-Zaldivar, Juan Nicolás 456
  1. 1 Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
    info

    Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ha64j07

  2. 2 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

  3. 3 Universidad Europea de Canarias
    info

    Universidad Europea de Canarias

    Orotava, España

    ROR https://ror.org/051xcrt66

  4. 4 Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro
    info

    Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro

    Madrid, España

  5. 5 Physical Therapy Unit, Primary Health Care Center “El Abajón”, 28231 Las Rozas de Madrid
  6. 6 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
Sustainability

ISSN: 2071-1050

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 14

Número: 24

Páginas: 16439

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3390/SU142416439 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Sustainability

Resumen

Introduction: Nowadays, it is increasingly urgent to regulate the use of the natural resources of our planet. From the field of physiotherapy, it is necessary to address this issue to ensure that our centers comply as much as possible with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Objective: To analyze the current situation in physiotherapy clinics in the Community of Madrid so as to identify whether their managers are aware of the concept of sustainability and its levels of application. Material and Methods: A survey study was carried out with the collaboration of 52 physiotherapy clinics in the Community of Madrid (Spain) to collect relevant data on sustainability. The questions were designed by experts in physiotherapy and sustainability with the aim of obtaining as much information as possible, analyzing the knowledge of sustainability and part of the goals established in the 2030 agenda. The procedures were conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement and checklist, in addition to following the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain (CIPI/22.016). Results: A total of 35 questions were answered by 52 physiotherapy clinics in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (Spain) that completed the survey. In addition to the results of each question related to the concept of sustainability, significant differences were observed in the proportion of emotions detected with the NRC dictionary in the question about how waste is removed from the center (p = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively) with a higher proportion of positive feelings with emotions of joy, anticipation, confidence and surprise expressed by participants from clinics of less than 90 m2, while in those from clinics of more than 90 m2, negative feelings predominated with emotions of disgust, fear or sadness; in both cases, the effect of size was large and significant. Conclusions: Most of the physiotherapy clinics in the Community of Madrid that participated in the study are aware of the concept of sustainability. However, in practice, they do not sufficiently apply sustainability protocols in their clinics.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

The APC was funded by Fundación de Investigation Biomedica del Hospital Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda, C/Joaquín Rodrigo 2, Edif Laboratorios, Planta 0, 28222, Madrid.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 1. Pecl, G.T.; Araújo, M.B.; Bell, J.D.; Blanchard, J.; Bonebrake, T.C.; Chen, I.-C.; Clark, T.D.; Colwell, R.K.; Danielsen, F.; Evengård, B.; et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 2017, 355, eaai9214. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 2. United Nations. The Environment Becomes a Political Issue. Highlights of the Brundtland Commission Report. In UN Chronicle; United Nations Department of Global Communications: New York, NY, USA, 1988; Volume 25, pp. 38–39.
  • 3. Gaudencio, L.M.A.; de Oliveira, R.; Curi, W.F. Sustainability Indicators System Based on Multicriteria Analysis: A Tool for the Management of the Sustainability of Offshore Oil and Gas Production Units. Integr. Environ. Assess Manag. 2021, 17, 614–625. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 4. Albert, J.S.; Destouni, G.; Duke-Sylvester, S.M.; Magurran, A.E.; Oberdorff, T.; Reis, R.E.; Winemiller, K.O.; Ripple, W.J. Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis. Ambio 2021, 50, 85–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 5. Watts, N.; Amann, M.; Arnell, N.; Ayeb-Karlsson, S.; Beagley, J.; Belesova, K.; Boykoff, M.; Byass, P.; Cai, W.; Campbell-Lendrum, D.; et al. The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Responding to converging crises. Lancet 2021, 397, 129–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 6. Gibb, R.; Franklinos, L.H.V.; Redding, D.W.; Jones, E.K. Ecosystem perspectives are needed to manage zoonotic risks in changing climate. BMJ 2020, 371, m3389. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 7. Faerron Guzman, C.; Aguirre, A.; Astle, B.; Barros, E.; Bayles, B.; Chimbari, M.; El-Abbadi, N.; Evert, J.; Hackett, F.; Howard, C.; et al. A framework to guide planetary health education. Lancet Planet. Health 2021, 5, e253–e255. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Eyuboglu, K.; Uzar, U. Asymmetric causality between renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Fresh evidence from some emerging countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 21899–21911. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Boggia, A.; Cortina, C. Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: A case study. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91, 2301–2306. [CrossRef]
  • 10. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Environmentally Sustainable Health Systems: A Strategic Document; WHO: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2017.
  • 11. McKenzie, B.J.; Haas, R.; Ferreira, G.E.; Maher, C.G.; Buchbinder, R. The environmental impact of health care for musculoskeletal conditions: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0276685. [CrossRef]
  • 12. NHWDS Data Tool and Resources. Available online: http://hwd.health.gov.au (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  • 13. INE Instituto Nacional de Estadística Fisioterapeutas colegiados por año y sexo. Available online: https://www.ine.es/up/ OfFeU5hri1 (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  • 14. Adam, V.; Wu, Q.; Nowack, B. Integrated dynamic probabilistic material flow analysis of engineered materials in all European countries. NanoImpact. 2021, 22, 100312. [CrossRef]
  • 15. López-Rodriguez, J.; García Sant-Calcedo, C.; Pérez Atanet, A.; Celma, R. Gestión Energética en Centros Sanitarios, 1st ed.; Universidad de Extremadura, Agencia Extremeña de la Energía: Badajoz, Spain, 2011.
  • 16. Shaw, E.; Walpole, S.; McLean, M.; Alvarez-Nieto, C.; Barna, S.; Bazin, K.; Behrens, G.; Chase, H.; Duane, B.; El Omrani, O.; et al. AMEE consensus statement: Planetary health and education for sustainable healthcare. Med. Teach. 2021, 43, 272–286. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 17. Maric, F.; Nicholls, D.; Mostert, K.; Culpan, J.; Stone, O.; van Wijchen, J.; Kennedy, M.; Long, I.; Bundtzen, T. The Environmental Physiotherapy Agenda 2023; Environmental Physiotherapy Association (EPA): Oslo, Norway, 2020.
  • 18. Maric, F.; Chance-Larsen, K.; Chevan, J.; Jameson, S.; Nicholls, D.; Opsommer, E.; Perveen, W.; Richter, R.; Stanhope, J.; Stone, O.; et al. A progress report on planetary health, environmental and sustainability education in physiotherapy—Editorial. Eur. J. Physiother. 2021, 23, 201–202. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Palstam, A.; Sehdev, S.; Barna, S.; Andersson, M.; Liebenberg, N. Sustainability in physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Orthop. Trauma 2022, 36, 279–283. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Palstam, A.; Andersson, M.; Lange, E.; Grenholm, A. A Call to Include a Perspective of Sustainable Development in Physical Therapy Research. Phys. Ther. 2021, 101, pzaa228. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Sinatti, P.; Sánchez Romero, E.A.; Martínez-Pozas, O.; Villafañe, J.H. Effects of Patient Education on Pain and Function and Its Impact on Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Pain Related to Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 6194. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Van, D.P.; Valcarenghi, L.; Dias, M.P.; Kondepu, K.; Castoldi, P.; Wong, E. Energy-saving framework for passive optical networks with ONU sleep/doze mode. Opt. Express. 2015, 23, A1–A14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 23. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2020; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 19 July 2011).
  • 24. Taber, K.S. The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res. Sci. Educ. 2018, 48, 1273–1296. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Hintze, J.L.; Tests for Coefficient Alpha. NCSS PASS. 2015. Available online: https://www.ncss.com/wp-content/themes/ncss/ pdf/Procedures/PASS/Tests_for_One_Coefficient_Alpha.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  • 26. Sakoda, J.M. Measures of Association for Multivariate Contingency Tables. In Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association (Part III); American Statistical Association: Boston, MA, USA, 1977; pp. 777–780.
  • 27. Smithson, M.J. Confidence Intervals, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series; No. 140; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 39–41.
  • 28. Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: And Sex and Drugs and Rock “N” Roll, 4th ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA; London, UK; New Delhi, India, 2013.
  • 29. Revelle, W.; Zinbarg, R.E. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika 2009, 74, 1145–1154. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Liu, B. Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity. In Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall/CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 627–666.
  • 31. Finn Årup, N. Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. In Proceedings of the ESWC2011 Workshop on ‘Making Sense of Microposts’: Big Things Come in Small Packages 718 in CEUR Workshop Proceedings; 2011; pp. 93–98. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2903 (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  • 32. Mohammad, S.; Turney, P. Crowdsourcing a Word-Emotion Association Lexicon. Comput. Intell. 2013, 29, 436–465. [CrossRef]
  • 33. Brooke, J.M.; Tofiloski, K.; Taboada, M. Cross-Linguistic Sentiment Analysis: From English to Spanish. In Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP-2009, Borovets, Bulgaria, 14–16 September 2009; pp. 50–54.
  • 34. Taboada, M.; Brooke, J.M.; Tofiloski, K.; Voll, M. Stede Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis. Comput. Linguist. 2011, 37, 267–307. [CrossRef]
  • 35. Vilares, D.; Alonso Pardo, M.; Gómez-Rodríguez, C. Polarity classification of opinionated Spanish texts using dependency parsing. Proces. Leng. Nat. 2013, 50, 13–20.
  • 36. Roberts, M.; Stewart, B.; Tingley, D. Navigating the Local Modes of Big Data: The Case of Topic Models. In Data Analytics in Social Science, Government, and Industry; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016.
  • 37. Rajkumar Arun, V.; Suresh, C.E.; Veni, M.; Narasimha Murthy, M.N. On finding the natural number of topics with latent dirichlet allocation: Some observations. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; Zaki, M.J., Xu Yu, J., Ravindran, B., Pudi, V., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 391–402.
  • 38. Campbell, J.C.; Hindle, A.; Stroulia, E. Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Extracting Topics from Software Engineering Data. In The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data; Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 139–159.
  • 39. Starks, H.; Trinidad, S.B. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual. Health Res. 2007, 17, 1372–1380. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 40. Gupta, A.; Aeron, S.; Agrawal, A.; Gupta, H. Trends in COVID-19 Publications: Streamlining Research Using NLP and LDA. Front. Digit. Health 2021, 3, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 41. Visser, P.S.; Krosnick, J.A.; Marquette, J.; Curtin, M. Mail surveys for election forecasting? An evaluation of the Columbus Dispatch poll. Public Opin. Q. 1996, 60, 181–227. [CrossRef]
  • 42. Keeter, S.; Miller, C.; Kohut, A.; Groves, R.M.; Presser, S. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opin. Q. 2000, 64, 125–148. [CrossRef]
  • 43. Curtin, R.; Presser, S.; Singer, E. The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opin. Q. 2000, 64, 413–428. [CrossRef]
  • 44. Lazuka-Nicoulaud, E.; Naidoo, K.; Gross, K.; Marcano Williams, J.; Kirsten-Coleman, A. The Power of Advocacy: Advancing Vision for Everyone to Meet the Sustainable Development Goals. Int. J. Public Health 2022, 67, 1604595. [CrossRef]
  • 45. Asiedu, B.A.; Hassan, A.A.; Bein, M.A. Renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and economic growth: Evidence from 26 European countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 11119–11128. [CrossRef]
  • 46. Sabbahi, D.A.; El-Naggar, H.M.; Zahran, M.H. Management of dental waste in dental offices and clinics in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2020, 70, 1022–1029. [CrossRef]
  • 47. Baxter, N.B.; Yoon, A.P.; Chung, K.C. Variability in the Use of Disposable Surgical Supplies: A Surgeon Survey and Life Cycle Analysis. J. Hand Surg. Am. 2021, 46, 1071–1078. [CrossRef]
  • 48. Arora, M.; Nair, S.; Malano, H.; George, B. A combined simulation-optimisation modelling framework for assessing the energy use of urban water systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 274, 111166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 49. Kumari, N.; Kumar, P.; Sahu, N.C. Do energy consumption and environmental quality enhance subjective wellbeing in G20 countries? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 60246–60267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • 50. Liebe, U.; Gewinner, J.; Diekmann, A. Large and persistent effects of green energy defaults in the household and business sectors. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2021, 5, 576–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed]