Limitaciones Pedagógicas de los Laboratorios Remotos de Control

  1. Nourdine Aliane 1
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

Actas:
XXIX Jornadas de Automática

Editorial: CEA-IFAC

ISBN: 978-84-691-6883-7

Año de publicación: 2008

Tipo: Aportación congreso

GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

En los últimos años, hemos asistido a un desarrollo significativo de loslaboratorios remotos. Su integración en el ámbito académico ofrece muchas ventajasdesde el punto de vista logístico. No obstante, desde el punto de vistas pedagógicoesas ventajas no son tan evidentes y muchos investigadores tienen serias dudas sobresu efectividad. En este trabajo, se presenta nuestra experiencia en la utilización de unlaboratorio remoto de control. Dicha experiencia se plasma en la presentación de lasopiniones de los alumnos y del profesor como usuarios de un sistema deexperimentación remota. Finalmente, se presentarán algunas limitacionespedagógicas más importantes de los laboratorios remotos en el área del controlautomático

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aburdene, M.F., E. J. Mastascusa y R. Massengale, (1991). A proposal for a remotely shared control systems laboratory, In Proc of the ASEE, Frontiers in Education Conference, 589-592, USA-Lafayette.
  • Aktan, B., y C. A. Bohus, (1996). Distance learning Applied to control engineering laboratories, IEEE Transactions on Education, 39(3), 320-326.
  • Aliane, N., y otros, (2006). An internet-based control engineering laboratory, Proc 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control EducationACE’06, Madrid-Spain, CD-ROM.
  • Aliane, N., y otros, (2007). LABNET: A remote control engineering laboratory, International Journal of Online Engineering 3(2), [en línea], http://www.i-joe.org/ojs/viewarticle.php?id=97: Último acceso: 15 de junio 2007.
  • Astrom, K. J., (2006). Challenges in control education, Proc 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education-ACE’06, MadridSpain. Åström, K. J., y T. Hagglund, (1995). PID controllers: theory, design, and tuning, 2nd Edition, ISA, North Carolina, USA, 59-116.
  • Aziz, E.S., S. K. Esche y C. Chassapis, (2006). A scalable platform for remote and virtual laboratories, World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 5(3), 445-448.
  • Casini, M. y D. Prattichizzo, (2003). The automatic control Telelab: A user-friendly interface for distance learning, IEEE Transaction on Education, 46(2), 252-257.
  • Casini, M., D. Prattichizzo y A. Vicino, (2004). The automatic control Telelab: A Web-based tecnology for distance learning, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 24(3), 36-44.
  • Cooper, M., (2005). Remote laboratories in teaching and learning: International Journal of Online Engineering, 1(1), [en-line] http://www.ijoe.org/ojs/viewarticle.php?id=11, último acceso: 15 Junio (2007).
  • Donzellini, G, and D. Ponta, (2006) “The electronic Laboratory: Traditional, simulated or remote?” In Advances on remote Laboratories and E-learning experiences, University of Deusto, pp.223-245.
  • Dormido, S., (2004). Control learning: Present and future, Annual Review in Control, 18(1), 115-136.
  • Esche, S. K., (2005). On the integration of remote experimentation into undergraduate laboratories: Pedagogical approach, International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 397-407.
  • Esche, S. K., (2006). On the integration of remote experimentation into undergraduate laboratories: Technical implementation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(1), 43-53.
  • Gillet, D., A. V. Nguyen y Y. Rekik, (2005). Collaborative web-based experimentation in flexible engineering education, IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 696–704.
  • Lyle, F. D., y R. J. Albert, (2005). Role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121-131.
  • Ma, J. y J.V. Nickerson, (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative: Literature review, ACM Computing surveys, 38(3), article 7.
  • Muller, D. y H. Erbe, (2006). Collaborative remote laboratory in engineering education: Challenge and vision, In Proc Advances on Remote Laboratories and e-learning experiences. Bilbao– Spain, pp. 35–59.
  • Nedic. Z, J. Machotka y A. Nafalski, (2003), Remote Laboratorios versus virtual and real laboratorios, 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in education Conference,T3-E1-E6.
  • Nickerson, J.V., J. E. Corter y S. K. Esche, (2007). A model for evaluating the effectiveness of remote engineering laboratories and simulations in education, Computers and Education, 49(3), 708-725.
  • Olds, B. M., B. M. Moskal y R. L. Miller, (2005). assessment in engineering education: Evolution, approaches, and future collaborations, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 13-25.
  • Overstreet J. W. y A. Tzes, (1999). Real-time control engineering laboratory, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 19(5), 19-34.
  • Pastor, R., J. Sánchez y S. Dormido, (2003). A XMLbased framework for the development of webbased laboratories focused on control systems education, International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(3), 445-454.
  • Sánchez, J., S. Dormido, R. Pastor y F. Morilla, (2004). A JAVA/MATLAB-based environment for remote control systems laboratories: Illustrated with an inverted pendulum, IEEE Trans on Education, 43(3), 321-329.
  • Trevelyan, J. P. (2004), Lessons learned from 10 years experience with remote laboratories, International Conference on Engineering Education Research, Olomouc, República Checa, 1-11.
  • Zhuang, H. y S. D. Morgera, (2007). Development of an undergraduate course: Internet-based instrumentation and control, Computer and Education, 49(2), 330-344