Time delay in the acquisition of verbal correspondence in adults: An exploratory study

  1. Concepción Serrador-Diez 12
  2. Gerardo Ortiz Rueda 1
  3. María Xesús Froxán-Parga 2
  4. Paula Cuevas López 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Guadalajara
    info

    Universidad de Guadalajara

    Guadalajara, México

    ROR https://ror.org/043xj7k26

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Journal:
Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento

ISSN: 2526-6551

Year of publication: 2021

Volume: 17

Issue: 2

Type: Article

GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento

Abstract

Say-Do correspondence is typically defined as individuals’ doing what they said they would do and accurately reporting what they did. The present study evaluated the effects of the delay between responses of verbal correspondence (Say, Do, Report) and the relation among responses (Say-Do, Do-Report, Say-Report, and Say-Do-Report) in a correspondence procedure. Eight adults were assigned to one of two groups that were differentiated by the delay among responses: Non-Delayed group (i.e., 0 hours among responses), Delayed group (i.e., 24 hours among responses). The correspondence task consisted of three phases: (1) Say (answering questions), (2) Do (performing different actions in relation to Say), and (3) Report (answering questions about Do). The Delayed group presented lower percentages of correspondence, but no statistically significant differences were found between groups. We discuss the increase in value of the delay variable and relevance of this delay to matching in clinical contexts. Keywords: Verbal correspondence; Say-Do; Do-Report; temporal delay; adults.

Bibliographic References

  • Ávila-Herrero, I. (2020). Correspondencia Decir-Hacer-Reportar en contextos semi-naturales: una propuesta metodológica. Master’s thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
  • Baer, R., Osnes, P., & Stokes, T. (1983). Training generalized correspondence between verbal behavior at school and nonverbal behavior at home. Education and Treatment of Children, 6(4), 379-388.
  • Beckert. (2005). Análise do comportamento: Pesquisa, teoria e aplicação.ArtmedCoelho, C. R., Wechsler, A., & do Amaral, V. L. R. (2008).
  • Dizer e fazer: a prática de exercícios físicos em portadores de diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 10(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v10i1.178
  • Cortez, M. D., Miguel, C. F., & de Rose, J. C. (2017). Effects of different types of correspondence training on the maintenance of children’s self-report accuracy. Acta Comportamentalia,25(4), 511-527.
  • Cumming, W. W. & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant studies of matching to sample and related problems. In: D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization(pp. 284-330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • da Silva, S. P. & Lattal K. A. (2010). Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in Say-Do correspondence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 395-413.
  • de Faria Brino, A. L. & de Rose, J. C. (2006). Correspondência entre auto-relatos e desempenhos acadêmicos antecedentes em crianças com história de fracasso escolar. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 2(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v2i1.803
  • de Freitas Ribeiro, A. (1989). Correspondence in children's self-report: tacting and manding aspects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(3), 361-367.
  • de Oliveira, M. A., Cortez, M. D., & de Rose, J. (2016). Efeitos do contexto de grupo no autorrelatode crianças sobre seus desempenhos em um jogo computadorizado.Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento,7(1), 70-85.https://doi.org/10.18761/pac.2015.026
  • Delgado, U. (2013). Generalización y transferencia de la correspondencia Decir/Hacer desde una perspectiva de campo interactivo. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
  • DiCola, K., & Clayton, M. C. (2017). El uso arbitrario Estímulos para enseñar Di-Do Correspondencia a niños con autismo. International journal of psychology and psychological therapy, 17(2), 149-160.
  • Froxán-Parga, M. X., Ávila-Herrero, I.,Trujillo-Sánchez, C., Serrador-Diez, C., & Núñez de Prado-Gordillo, M. (2019). Análisis de la correspondencia Decir-Hacer-Reportar en terapia: un estudio piloto. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues,11(2), 55-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fesi.20070780.2019.11.2.75671
  • Guevremont, D. C., Osnes, P. G., & Stokes, T. F. (1986). Preparation for effective self-regulation: the development of generalized verbal control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(1), 99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1986.19-99
  • Herruzo, J. & Luciano, C. (1994). Procedimientos para establecer la “correspondencia decir hacer.” Un análisis de sus elementos y problemas pendientes. Acta Comportamentalia, 2, 192-218.
  • Hernández, A., Blanco. C. &Morales, C. (2010). Efectos del entrenamiento en la correspondencia decir-hacer sobre la efectividad en tareas de transferencia del aprendizaje Studiositas,5 ( 2), 61-77
  • Huffman, R. W., Sainato, D. M., & Curieli, E. S. L. (2016). Correspondence training using special interests to increase compliance during transitions: an emerging technology. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9, 25-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0100-1
  • Israel, A. C. (1978). Some thoughts on correspondence between saying and doing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-271
  • Lattal, K. A. & Doepke, K. J. (2001). Correspondence asconditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(2), 127-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-127
  • Lima, E.L. & Abreu-Rodrigues, J. (2010). Verbal mediating responses: effects on generalization of say-do correspondence and non correspondence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3), 411-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-411
  • Lloyd, K. E. (2002). A review of correspondence training: suggestions for a revival. Behavior Analyst, 25(1), 57-73.
  • Luciano, M. C., Vilchez, F., & Herruzo, J. (1992). Say-do and thumbsucking behavior. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 14(1), 63-69.
  • Mazzoca, R. & Cortez, M. (2020). O papel de contingências de competição no autorrelato de crianças sobre seus desempenhos em um jogo computadorizado.Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva,21, 432-450.https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v21i4.1404
  • Medeiros, N. & Medeiros, C. (2018). Correspondência verbal na Terapia Analítica Comportamental: Contribuições da pesquisa básica. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 20(1), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.31505/rbtcc.v20i1.1136
  • Perez, W. (2017) Explicações comportamentais da correspondência dizer-fazer. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 13(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v13i1.5260
  • Risley, T. R. & Hart, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the nonverbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(4), 267-281.
  • Rodríguez, M.E. (2000). Efecto del entrenamiento de la correspondencia decir-hacer, decir-describir y hacer-describir sobre la adquisición, generalidad y mantenimiento de una tarea de discriminación condicional en humanos. Acta Comportamentalia, 8, 41-75.
  • Rodríguez, M.E. (2002). Análisis de las variables que influyen en el establecimiento de correspondencias entre factores verbales y no verbales en tareas de discriminación condicional. Doctoral thesis, Universidad de Guadalajara.
  • Weninger, J. M. & Baer, R. A. (1990). Correspondence training with time delay: a comparison with reinforcement of compliance. Education and Treatment of Children, 13(1), 34-42.