¿Es viable el fútbol de élite sobre césped artificial?El caso FIFA Women World Cup™

  1. Felipe, José Luis 1
  2. Burillo, Pablo 1
  3. Fernández-Luna, Álvaro 1
  4. García-Unanue, Jorge 1
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid. Departamento de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte
Revista:
Revista de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1132-239X,  1988-5636

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Economía, gestión y márketing en organizaciones deportivas

Volumen: 25

Número: 1

Páginas: 81-84

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de psicología del deporte

Resumen

The aim of this research is to compare the game play variables in artificial turf vs. natural turf at high performance level and to assess in which manner it affects to the sport performance and the management of the facility. We analyzed 283 women players who participated in the FIFA® World Championship of 2011 (natural grass) and 483 women players of 2015 (artificial turf). Variables measured were passes, touches, dribbles, and tackles. We used U of Mann-Whitney test to evaluate the differences between two tournaments. Results showed that the success percentage of all game play actions is higher in artificial turf (World Championship 2015) in most of variables analyzed (except dribbles), in total and depending on player position.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Este estudio ha recibido financiación de la convocatoria de proyectos internos de la Universidad Europea de Madrid (2015/UEM08).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andersson, H., Ekblom, B. y Krustrup, P. (2008). Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: Movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(2), 113-122.
  • Bradley, P.S. Carling, S., Gómez-Díaz, A., Hood, P., Barnes, C., Ade, J.… y Mohr, M. (2013). Match performance and physical capacity of players in the top three competitive standards of English professional soccer. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 808-821.
  • Brito, J., Krustrup, P. y Rebelo, A. (2012). The influence of the playing surface on the exercise intensity of small-sided recreational soccer games. Human Movement Science, 31(4), 946-956.
  • Burillo, P., Gallardo, L., Felipe, J. L. y Gallardo, A. (2012a). Mechanical assessment of artificial turf football pitches: the consequences of no quality certification. Scientific Research and Essays, 7(28), 2457-2465.
  • Burillo, P., Gallardo, L., Felipe, J. L. y Gallardo, A. (2012b). Artificial turf surfaces: Perception of safety, sporting feature, satisfaction and preference of football users. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(1), S437-S447.
  • Carling, C. (2013). Interpreting physical performance in professional soccer match-play: Should we be more pragmatic in our approach? Sports Medicine, 43, 655-663.
  • Castellano, J., Casamichana, D. y Lago, C. (2012). The use of match statistics that discriminate between successful and unsuccesful soccer teams. Journal of Human Kinetics, 31, 201-211.
  • Claudio, L. (2008). Synthetic turf health debates take roots. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(3), 116-122.
  • Collet, C. (2013). The possesion game? A comparative analysis of ball retention and team success in European and international football, 2007-2010. [Comparative study]. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(2), 123-136.
  • Di Salvo, V., Baron, R., Tschan, H., Calderón-Montero, F.J., Bachl, N. y Pigozzi, F. (2007). Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28, 222-227.
  • Felipe, J. L., Gallardo. L., Burillo, P., Gallardo, A., Sánchez-Sánchez, J. y Plaza-Carmona, M. (2013). Artificial turf football fields: A qualitative vision for professionals players and coaches. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation, 35(2), 105-120.
  • Fleming, P. (2012). Maintenance best practice and recent research. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 225, 159-170
  • Fuller C. W., Clarke, L. y Molloy, M.G. (2010). Risk of injury associated with rugby union played on artificial turf. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(5), 563-570.
  • Fuller, C. W., Dick, R. W., Corlette, J. y Schmalz, R. (2007). Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: match injuries. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(1), 20-26.
  • Gallardo, A., Felipe, J. L., Burillo, P. y Gallardo, L. (2010). Trainers and players satisfaction in the grass and artificial turf football fields. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 15, 189-199.
  • James, I. T. y McLeod, A. (2008). Maintaining synthetic turf: Sand filled systems. Cranfield: Cranfield University.
  • Liu, Y-D., Taylor, P. y Shibli, S. (2009). Sport equity: benchmarking the performance of English public sport facilities. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(1), 3-21.
  • Sánchez-Sánchez, J., García-Unanue, J., Felipe, J.L., Jiménez-Reyes, P., Viejo-Romero, D., Gómez-López, M.T., Hernando, E., Burillo, P. y Gallardo, L. (2016). Physical and physiological responses of amateur football players on 3rd generation artificial turf systems during simulated game situations. The Journal of Strength y Conditioning Research, DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001415
  • Sandkuehler, P., Torres, E. y Allgeuer, T. (2010). Performance artificial turf components-fibrillated tape. Procedia Engineering, 2(2), 3367-3372.
  • Stiles, V. H., James, I. T., Dixon, S. J. y Guisasola, I. N. (2009) Natural turf surfaces: The case for continued research. Sports Medicine, 39(1), 65-84.
  • Zanetti, E. M. (2009). Amateur football game on artificial turf: Players’ perceptions. Applied Ergonomics, 40(3), 485-490.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet