El análisis de conducta como herramienta de transformación social: Ideología y ciencia

  1. Ricardo de Pascual Verdú 1
  2. Miguel Núñez de Prado-Gordillo 2
  3. Gladis Pereira Xavier 2
  4. Jesús Alonso Vega 2
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01cby8j38

Book:
Aproximaciones al estudio del comportamiento y sus aplicaciones: Vol. III
  1. Vicente Pérez Fernández

Publisher: UNED

ISBN: 978-84-362-7714-2

Year of publication: 2022

Pages: 179-201

Type: Book chapter

GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Abstract

Las acciones de las personas dedicadas al análisis de conducta están guiadaspor los mismos principios (i.e. determinismo, empirismo, experimentación, replicación, parsimonia, duda filosófica) que guían la actuación en cualquier otradisciplina científica. Estos principios nos han ayudado a describir, predecir y controlar el comportamiento de distintos organismos, crear nuevas tecnologías (p.ej. nuevas técnicas para análisis funcionales, análisis de sistemas sociales, nuevos diseños intra-sujeto, etc.) y elaborar nuevos conceptos dentro de las ciencias del comportamiento (p.ej. relaciones de equivalencia entre estímulos y otras relaciones arbitrarias entre estímulos, teorías sobre el desarrollo de la conducta verbal, operaciones motivadoras condicionadas, etc.). Sin embargo, estos principios no son los únicos que guían o controlan el comportamiento de las personas dedicadas al análisis de conducta. Los y las analistas de conducta toman decisiones que afectan directa e indirectamente al comportamiento de otros organismos; en este sentido, los principios científicos determinan cómo se deben analizar las variables que controlan el comportamiento, pero no sobre qué comportamientos se debe intervenir ni cómo se debe intervenir sobre los mismos.

Bibliographic References

  • Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Nature, 497(7451), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a
  • Almagro, M. (2021). Seeing hate from afar: the concept of affective polarization reassessed. (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Granada).
  • Bailey, J., & Burch, M. (2016). Ethics for Behavior Analysts. Routledge.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press. (Originalmente publicado en 1979).
  • Brantley, D. C., & Webster, R. E. (1993). Use of an independent group contingency management system in a regular classroom setting. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 60-66.
  • Coliva, A. (2016). The Varieties of Self-Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E. & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis. Pearson UK.
  • Couto, A. G., & Dittrich, A. (2017). Feminismo e análise do comportamento: caminhos para o diálogo. Perspectivas em análise do comportamento, 8(2), 147-158.
  • Da Silva Ferreira, T. A., Simões, A. S., Ferreira, A. R., & dos Santos, B. O. S. (2020). What are values in clinical behavior analysis? Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(1), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00219-w
  • Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York, Dover Publications. http://archive.org/details/experiencenature00dewe
  • Freeman, R. B., & Huang, W. (2014). Collaboration: Strength in diversity. Nature News, 513(7518), 305.
  • Froján-Parga, M. X., Núñez de Prado-Gordillo, M., & de Pascual Verdú, R. (2017). Cognitive techniques and language: A return to behavioral origins. Psicothema, 29(3), 352-357.
  • Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in walden two. Behavior analysis and social action, 5(1), 2-8. — (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 133–151. https://doi. org/10.1007/bf03392470. — (1991). Process and content in behavioral and cultural phenomena. Behavior and Social Issues, 1(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v1i2.163. — (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393175.
  • Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., ... Vasconcelos, L. A. (2016). Toward Consistent Terminology in a Behaviorist Approach to Cultural Analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25(0), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634
  • Goddard, M. J. (2014). Critical Psychiatry, Critical Psychology, and the Behaviorism of B. F. Skinner. Review of General Psychology, 18(3), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000012
  • Goltz, S. M. (2003). Considering political behavior in organizations. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4(3), 354-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100024
  • Hayes, L. J., & Tarbox, J. (2007). Ethics and Values in Behavioral Perspective. En J. W. Jacobson, J. A. Mulick, & J. Rojahn (eds.), Handbook of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (pp. 691-717). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32931-5_35
  • Heras-Escribano, M. (2019). The philosophy of affordances. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Heras-Escribano, M., & Pinedo-García, M. D. (2018). Naturalism, non-factualism, and normative situated behaviour. South African Journal of Philosophy, 37(1), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2017.1422633
  • Holland, J. G. (1974a). Are behavioral principles for revolutionaries? En F. S. Keller, & E. R. Iñesta (eds.) Behavior Modification. Applications to Education (pp. 265-281). Academic Press. — (1974b). Behavior Modification for Prisoners, Patients, And Other People As A Prescription For The Planned Society. The Prison Journal, 54(1), 23- 37. https://doi.org/10.1177/003288557405400104 — (1978). Behaviorism: Part of the problem or part of the solution? Journal of applied behavior analysis, 11(1), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-163 — (2016). Behavior analysis and positive human values. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 18, 104-117
  • Kelshaw-Levering, K., Sterling-Turner, H. E., Henry, J. R., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Randomized interdependent group contingencies: Group reinforcement with a twist. Psychology in the Schools, 37(6), 523-533.
  • Leigland, S. (2005). Variables of which values are a function. The Behavior Analyst, 28(2), 133-142.
  • Lewis, T. J., Powers, L. J., Kely, M. J. & Newcomer, L. L. (2002). Reducing problem behaviors on the playground: An investigation of the application of schoolwide positive behavior supports. Psychology in the Schools, 39(2), 181-190.
  • Litoe, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(3), 341.
  • Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 31-56. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi. v15i1.344.
  • Najdowski, A. C., Gharapetian, L., & Jewett, V. (2021). Toward the Development of Antiracist and Multicultural Graduate Training Programs in Behavior Analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(2), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00504-0
  • Nielsen, M. W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Joshi, A., ... & Schiebinger, L. (2017). Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(8), 1740-1742.
  • Núñez de Prado-Gordillo, M., Abalo Rodríguez, I., Estal Muñoz, V., & Froxán Parga, M. X. (2020). Cuestiones filosóficas en torno al análisis de la conducta. En M. X. Froxán Parga (coord.) Análisis funcional de la conducta humana: Concepto, metodología y aplicaciones (1.ª ed., pp. 51-79). Pirámide.
  • Pérez-Navarro, E., Fernández-Castro, V., González de Prado-Salas, J., & Heras-Escribano, M. (2019). Not expressivist enough: Normative disagreement about belief attribution. Res Philosophica, 96(4), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1794
  • Pinedo-García, M. (2014). ¡No es un algo, pero tampoco es una nada! Mente y normatividad. Análisis, 1(1), 121-160. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_arif/a.rif.20141980
  • Plumb, J. C., Stewart, I., Dahl, J., & Lundgren, T. (2009). In search of meaning: Values in modern clinical behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 32(1), 85-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392177
  • Powell, K. (2018). These labs are remarkably diverse-Here’s why they’re winning at science. Nature, 558(7708), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05316-5
  • Real Academia Española. (s. f.). Ideología. En Diccionario de la lengua española. Recuperado de https://dle.rae.es/ideolog%C3%ADa
  • Ruiz, M. R., & Roche, B. (2007). Values and the scientific culture of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 30(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392139
  • Ryle, G. (2005). El concepto de lo mental. Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1949). Sandaker, I. (2006). How should behavior analysis interact effectively with the social sciences? Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi. v15i1.346
  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). A dispositional approach to attitudes: Thinking outside of the belief box. In N. Nottelman (ed.). New essays on belief (pp. 75-99). Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Shimp, C. P. (2007). Quantitative behavior analysis and human values. Behavioural Processes, 75(2), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.016
  • Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52(5), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062535 — (1953). Science and Human Behavior. MacMillan. — (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. Knopf/Random House. — (1974). About behaviorism. Knopf. — (1977). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. Behaviorism, 5(2), 1-10. — (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213(4507), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649 — (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist, 45(11), 1206– 1210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.11.1206
  • Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, T. H., & Skinner, A. L. (2000). Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer-monitored group contingency program on students’ reports of peers’ prosocial behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 37(3), 263-270.
  • Skinner, C. H., Skinner, C. F., Skinner, A. L., & Cashwell, T. H. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 806-820.
  • Tanney, J. (2009). Rethinking Ryle: a critical discussion of The Concept of Mind. In Ryle, G. (J. Tanney, ed.), The concept of mind (pp. ix – lvii). Routledge.
  • Todorov, J. C. (1987). A constituição como metacontingência [The constitution as metacontingency]. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 7(1), 9-13. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1414-98931987000100003.Villanueva, N. (2018). Expresivismo y semántica. En D. Pérez Chico (coord.), Cuestiones de la filosofía del lenguaje (pp. 437- 469). Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza.
  • Wilson, K. G. W., & DuFrene, T. (2009). Mindfulness for Two: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Approach to Mindfulness in Psychotherapy (Illustrated edition). New Harbinger Publications.