Nuevo concepto y herramienta para evaluar objetivamente el realismo en simulación clínica

  1. Gleyvis Coro-Montanet 1
  2. Óscar Oliva-Fernández 1
  3. Julia Sánchez-Ituarte 1
  4. María Jesús Pardo-Monedero 1
  1. 1 Universidad Europea de Madrid
    info
    Universidad Europea de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04dp46240

    Geographic location of the organization Universidad Europea de Madrid
Journal:
Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

ISSN: 2683-2348

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 5

Issue: 1

Pages: 30-37

Type: Article

DOI: 10.35366/110987 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

Abstract

Introduction: fidelity has been used, historically, to classifythe type of simulation being performed, but it relies ona subjective and fuzzy concept. Objectives: this articleproposes a categorized and subcategorized system toevaluate realism qualitatively and quantitatively througha more precise classification and a tool that evaluates thescenic realism indexes achieved in clinical simulation.It also aims to make known the elements of new sciencethat support the new concept and to promote culture andconsensus of what is measured, specifying how and bywhom it should be evaluated for a better didactic designand analysis of the effects -favorable or not- of the realismachieved. Material and methods: a three-year mixed study(Delphi method and validation by means of Cronbach’sAlpha, Guttman’s Lambda 6 and correlations) and factoranalysis was carried out to develop a new categorized andsubcategorized concept of realism and a measurement tool-theoretical and mathematical- online, validated, bilingual(English/Spanish), free, available on computer and cellphone. Results: given the versatility of its indicators thetool is available for any healthcare discipline that appliesthe learning methodology based on stage simulation.Conclusions: the new concept and evaluation tool allowsthe development of a new culture of interpretation of therealism achieved.

View funding

Funding information

Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el proyecto 2022UEM15 y la Beca de Investigación de la Sociedad Española de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente (SESSEP)

Funders

  • Sociedad Española de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente Spain
  • Universidad Europea de Madrid Spain

Bibliographic References

  • Wilson E, Hewett DG, Jolly BC, Janssens S, Beckmann MM. Is that realistic? The development of a realism assessment questionnaire and its application in appraising three simulators for a gynaecology procedure. Adv Simul (Lond). 2018; 3: 21.
  • Graham AC, McAleer S. An overview of realist evaluation for simulation-based education. Adv Simul 2018; 3 (13): 1-8.
  • Dromey BP, Peebles DM, Stoyanov DV. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of high-fidelity simulation in obstetric ultrasound. Simul Healthc. 2021; 16 (1): 52-59.
  • Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014; 89 (3): 387-392.
  • Cherry JP, Cristancho S, Lingard L, Cherry R, Haji F. Engagement: what is it good for? The role of learner engagement in healthcare simulation contexts. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018; 24 (4): 811-825.
  • Tun JK, Alinier G. Tang J. Kneebone RL. Redefining simulation fidelity for healthcare education. Simul Gaming. 2015; 46 (2): 159-174.
  • Dieckmann P, Graba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2 (3): 183-193.
  • Capogna E, Capogna G, Raccis D, Salvi F, Velardo M, Del Vecchio A. Eye tracking metrics and leader\\\'s behavioral performance during a post-partum hemorrhage high-fidelity simulated scenario. Adv Simul. 2021; 6 (4): 1-12.
  • Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9 (6): 339-349.
  • Andersson H, Svensson A, Frank C, Rantala A, Holmberg M, Bremer A. Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2022; 23 (1): 1-26.
  • Engstrom H, Hagiwara M, Backlund P, Lebram M, Lundberg L, Johannesson M. The impact of contextualization on immersion in healthcare simulation. Adv Simul. 2016; 1 (1): 1-11.
  • Coro-Montanet G, Pardo MMJ, De la Hoz Calvo A, Sánchez IJ, Oliva FO, Inouye SL. ProRealSim v1.0. Tool to calculate the realism index obtained in clinical simulation scenarios in physical environments [Internet]. Madrid: Universidad Europea; 2021 [6/10/2022]. Available in: https://prorealsim.universidadeuropea.com
  • Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel, D, Asvall S, Paraskeva P, Darzi A. An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Educ. 2002; (36): 628-634.
  • DeForest CA, Blackman V, Alex JE, Reeves L, Mora A, Maddry J, et al. Christine A. An evaluation of navy en route care training using a high-fidelity medical simulation scenario of interfacility patient transport. Mil Med. 2018; 183 (9-10): e383-e391.